2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of J integral to measure cohesive laws under large-scale yielding

Abstract: A method is developed to obtain the mode I cohesive law of elastic-plastic materials using a Double Cantilever Beam sandwich specimen loaded with pure bending moments. The approach is based on the validity of the J integral for materials having a non-linear stress-strain relationship without unloading of any material point. This assumption is not met exactly as there is a small region at the active cohesive zone where the material unloads. To examine the error of the method, a numerical parameter study is perf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One limitation of this VCCT approach is that it ignores the non-linear material response introduced by the damage process zone ahead of the notch tip. The limitation can be overcome by introducing a strain-softening material response [1,19,20]. However, extracting an objective constitutive law for trans-laminar fracture itself requires special procedures [12,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One limitation of this VCCT approach is that it ignores the non-linear material response introduced by the damage process zone ahead of the notch tip. The limitation can be overcome by introducing a strain-softening material response [1,19,20]. However, extracting an objective constitutive law for trans-laminar fracture itself requires special procedures [12,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Abaqus explicit solver is used to solve the problem of Figure 5 under quasi-static conditions using mass-scaling. An explicit solver is preferred to avoid convergence difficulties, which are commonly observed when modelling crack growth with implicit finite element methods [79,80].…”
Section: Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in-plane length of the cohesive element is 10 times the thickness h c and it is small enough to have more than 8 cohesive elements with the fracture process zone [43]. A non-zero cohesive zone thickness was preferred to avoid interpenetration problems [44]. As can be seen from Fig.…”
Section: Single Tape Compositementioning
confidence: 99%