1977
DOI: 10.2118/5624-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Application of Massive Hydraulic Fracturing to the Tight Muddy "J" Formation, Wattenberg Field, Colorado

Abstract: Laboratory and field research in Colorado's Wattenberg field showed that commercial gas production was feasible from the very tight Muddy "J" formation using massive hydraulic fracturing. Results indicate that the largest treatments are economically justified in the better areas of the field. Introduction This paper presents the results of a joint research and field effort to develop the very low permeability (0.05 to 0.005 md) Muddy "J" formation in the Watt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11) by J p :::: 1/(I+2(w)/vL), ............. (6) which indicates that the pad fraction decreases as the ratio (w)/vL increases.…”
Section: Review Of Design/placement Processmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…11) by J p :::: 1/(I+2(w)/vL), ............. (6) which indicates that the pad fraction decreases as the ratio (w)/vL increases.…”
Section: Review Of Design/placement Processmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such variability can be observed even within the relatively narrow confines of adjacent townships of a proved field with a blanket formation, as has been shown in the Wattenberg field. 5 Even greater variation can be expected in lenticular sands.…”
Section: Reservoir Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimulation treatment design in the J Sand has seen several developments. The history of early treatments has been documented by Fast, et al 3 Early hydraulic fracture treatments consisted of 30,000 to 50,000 gallons of KCl water gelled with guar gum at concentrations of 40 to 80 pounds per 1,000 gallons of water. These treatments carried 40,000 to 60,000 pounds of proppant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%