1951
DOI: 10.5254/1.3543103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Application of Rubber in the Quantitative Determination of Ozone

Abstract: A convenient rubber cracking test for ozone is described. This method serves not only as a rapid, positive means of identifying ozone in complex gas mixtures but also gives close approximation to the quantity present. Application of the method in determining ozone in heavy smog atmosphere is shown. The high ozone concentration in these tests is attributed to ozone formation under the catalytic action of nitrogen oxides and sunlight.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1954
1954
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Opinion, however, has been expressed that free radicals formed by the catalyzed photolysis of volatile peroxides 19 may be responsible for some rubber cracking. There are other complications including the effect of temperature 20 which make the evaluation of interferences in the determination of ozone by rubber cracking rather difficult.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Opinion, however, has been expressed that free radicals formed by the catalyzed photolysis of volatile peroxides 19 may be responsible for some rubber cracking. There are other complications including the effect of temperature 20 which make the evaluation of interferences in the determination of ozone by rubber cracking rather difficult.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Branchlets designated as controls were enclosed with stressed strips of ozone-sensitive rubber 8 in polyethylene bags during fumigation. Defective sealing of bags, occasionally encountered, was detected by cracking of the rubber strips and by development of new symptoms on the bag-protected foliage after fumigation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It smelled like a terpene laboratory" (Stephens, 1987). The CalTech team proceeded rapidly, using many of the same analytical methods as the SRI group (Bradley and Haagen-Smit, 1951;Shepherd et al, 1951). They quickly developed two hypotheses to explain photochemical smog, both of which were controversial because they strongly implicated refineries and automobiles in the smog problem.…”
Section: The Mysterious Reactantmentioning
confidence: 99%