2014 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-2014 Hunan) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/phm.2014.6988194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The applied of self-organizing clustering analysis on Coin-tap Test system of airplane composite structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, researchers improved the original theory and established more detailed and comprehensive detection procedures for aviation composite materials. [21][22][23][24] In recent years, a few researchers use the concept of percussion-based method to detect fatigue cracks of metal materials and bolt looseness in structural health monitoring. 25,26 For timber structures, engineers have used tapping sound to identify the health condition of the historical timber structures for many decades; however, the current reported tapping methods for timber damage diagnosis are mainly relied on the experiences of test personnel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, researchers improved the original theory and established more detailed and comprehensive detection procedures for aviation composite materials. [21][22][23][24] In recent years, a few researchers use the concept of percussion-based method to detect fatigue cracks of metal materials and bolt looseness in structural health monitoring. 25,26 For timber structures, engineers have used tapping sound to identify the health condition of the historical timber structures for many decades; however, the current reported tapping methods for timber damage diagnosis are mainly relied on the experiences of test personnel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been improved upon and built into several commercial instruments, including the woodpecker (Mitsui Heavy Industries), the rapid damage detection device (Boeing), and the computer aided tap tester (Iowa State University) [6]. More sophisticated approaches, including the use of neural nets [7] and cluster analysis [8], have been used for analyzing the response of such instruments. In a review of the tap test for defect detection of sandwich panels, the Federal Aeronautics Administration (FAA) found that the results were highly variable [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%