The architecture and effect of participation: a systematic review of community participation for communicable disease control and elimination. Implications for malaria elimination

Abstract

BackgroundCommunity engagement and participation has played a critical role in successful disease control and elimination campaigns in many countries. Despite this, its benefits for malaria control and elimination are yet to be fully realized. This may be due to a limited understanding of the influences on participation in developing countries as well as inadequate investment in infrastructure and resources to support sustainable community participation. This paper reports the findings of an atypical systematic review of 60 years of literature in order to arrive at a more comprehensive awareness of the constructs of participation for communicable disease control and elimination and provide guidance for the current malaria elimination campaign.MethodsEvidence derived from quantitative research was considered both independently and collectively with qualitative research papers and case reports. All papers included in the review were systematically coded using a pre-determined qualitative coding matrix that identified influences on community participation at the individual, household, community and government/civil society levels. Colour coding was also carried out to reflect the key primary health care period in which community participation programmes originated. These processes allowed exhaustive content analysis and synthesis of data in an attempt to realize conceptual development beyond that able to be achieved by individual empirical studies or case reports.ResultsOf the 60 papers meeting the selection criteria, only four studies attempted to determine the effect of community participation on disease transmission. Due to inherent differences in their design, interventions and outcome measures, results could not be compared. However, these studies showed statistically significant reductions in disease incidence or prevalence using various forms of community participation. The use of locally selected volunteers provided with adequate training, supervision and resources are common and important elements of the success of the interventions in these studies. In addition, qualitative synthesis of all 60 papers elucidates the complex architecture of community participation for communicable disease control and elimination which is presented herein.ConclusionsThe current global malaria elimination campaign calls for a health systems strengthening approach to provide an enabling environment for programmes in developing countries. In order to realize the benefits of this approach it is vital to provide adequate investment in the 'people' component of health systems and understand the multi-level factors that influence their participation. The challenges of strengthening this component of health systems are discussed, as is the importance of ensuring that current global malaria elimination efforts do not derail renewed momentum towards the comprehensive primary health care approach. It is recommended that the application of the results of this systematic review be considered for other diseases of poverty in order to harmo...

Elements of effective community engagement: lessons from a targeted malaria elimination study in Lao PDR (Laos)

“…Such research aims to identify potential participants’ beliefs, values, attitudes, knowledge and behaviors related to the health problem of interest and provide insight into key aspects of the local context [31,32]. With regard to malaria control programs, past failures of ‘one size fits all’ has prompted the development of a tailored approach [33]. Recently in Nigeria, such formative research was found valuable in designing the tailored chemoprevention intervention for malaria [34].…”

“…Recently in Nigeria, such formative research was found valuable in designing the tailored chemoprevention intervention for malaria [34]. Nevertheless, in many malaria control programs, to date, little formative research has been reported in term of informing community engagement [11,33]. For Lao TME, quantitative and qualitative methods were essential to design engagement strategies for particular village and sub-villages.…”

Health Fair: Community Involvement and Ownership in Event Planning

“…It is through empowerment that communities gain mastery over their lives and change their social and political environment to improve their health and quality of life (Wallerstein [22]). Since multiple reviews have argued the value of community participation [4]- [12], evaluations have largely focused on health outcomes. None assess the extent to which community participation figures in research on health systems interventions.…”

“…It has also been enshrined as an important standard within rights based approaches to health that has a basic value in and of itself [3]. Since these landmark agreements reinforce community involvement, considerable experience has been built regarding it, with plenty of argue and reflection about its definition, rationale and outcomes [4]- [12]. Community involvement can be instrumental as working with communities can help make interventions more relevant to local needs, informed by local knowledge and priorities, and therefore more effective.…”

Stakeholder Engagement in Community-based Malaria Studies in a Defined Setting in the Eastern Province, Rwanda

“…Community participation at multiple levels is an important factor to achieve locally meaningful responses towards further malaria control and sustain the achieved gains (Atkinson, Vallely, Fitzgerald, Whittaker, & Tanner, 2011). One approach towards sustainability of used interventions is effectively engaging with all stakeholders.…”