2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The argument structure of adjectival participles revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
36
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same line as previous literature, I argue that stative, target state, resultant state and experiential adjectival participles are the result of different syntactic configurations. In particular, I claim that two different sorts of aspectual heads give rise to the five-way classification of participles: a stativizing Asp head (Kratzer 2000;Embick 2004), and an aspectual operator with anteriority semantics (Kratzer 2000;Alexiadou et al 2014;Alexiadou et al 2015). As for the experiential participle, this interpretation emerges when the Asp head of anteriority combines with a particular vP semantics and with a particular co-indexing relation between the subject of predication and the arguments within VoiceP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the same line as previous literature, I argue that stative, target state, resultant state and experiential adjectival participles are the result of different syntactic configurations. In particular, I claim that two different sorts of aspectual heads give rise to the five-way classification of participles: a stativizing Asp head (Kratzer 2000;Embick 2004), and an aspectual operator with anteriority semantics (Kratzer 2000;Alexiadou et al 2014;Alexiadou et al 2015). As for the experiential participle, this interpretation emerges when the Asp head of anteriority combines with a particular vP semantics and with a particular co-indexing relation between the subject of predication and the arguments within VoiceP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As attested for other languages such as English and Greek, Basque adjectival participles can be interpreted as stative or resultative (Embick 2004), and also as target state participles or resultant state participles (Kratzer 2000). As noted in the literature (Anagnostopoulou 2003;Alexiadou & Anagnostopoulou 2008;Alexiadou, Gehrke & Schäfer 2014;Alexiadou, Anagnostopoulou & Schäfer 2015), these types are subject to different syntactic distribution, particularly regarding the acceptability of different sorts of event-related and subjectoriented modifiers. In this paper, I propose that a further aspectual class must be included into the typology of adjectival participles: experientials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, more recent developments have shown that verb phrases are substantially more internally complex than Wasow envisioned, and these developments have provided alternative avenues for exploring the behavior of participles. These avenues have lead to the current conventional wisdom that both types of participles are formed in the syntax (Kratzer , Anagnostopoulou , , Embick , Hallman , Bruening , Alexiadou, Gehrke and Schäfer , Alexiadou, Anagnostopoulou and Schäfer and others), as described in detail below.…”
Section: Word‐internal Syntaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aber vgl. auch Alexiadou, Gehrke & Schäfer (2014), wo Argumente für die selektive Zugänglichkeit des externen Arguments im Zustandspassiv vorgebracht werden (auf der Grundlage u. a. von morphologischer Evidenz bei kontrollierten Adjektiven und von Fällen disjunkter Referenz). Schäfer (2012b), Alexiadou & Doron (2013) und Alexiadou, Anagnastopoulou & Schäfer (2015.…”
Section: Synkretismusunclassified