The Argumentative Potential of Doubt: From Legitimate Concerns to Conspiracy Theories About COVID-19 Vaccines

Abstract

Doubt is a double-edge sword. On the one hand, uncertainty is essential for epistemic progress, and yet, doubt can also make us vulnerable to deception, confused to the point of no longer knowing what is true. What distinguishes a doubt that is epistemologically beneficial from one which is deceptive, or even manufactured in the context of a conspiracy theory? In this chapter, we explore doubt, its role, and the way it is being handled in the context of the public controversy about the COVID-19 vaccine. We approach conspiracy theories as argumentative discourses and reconstruct the generic structure of a conspiracy theory macro argument. Through the structure, we look into the discourse of the twelve prominent anti-vaxxers known as the “Disinformation Dozen”, focusing on the argumentative potential that doubt can have in the public controversy about the COVID-19 vaccine. We suggest to distinguish ambivalence from scepticism and denialism as three argumentative potentials that a motivated doubt can have. We argue that ambivalent doubt ought to be acknowledged, addressed and incorporated into the public health narrative, in order to avoid that an unnecessarily broad interpretation of conspiracy theory dominates the public debate and leaves an uncertain public a prey to it.

An insight overview on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: Advantageous, pharmacology, mechanism of action, and prospective considerations

“…In other words, can we accept that the system is trying to improve our standards of living? The vaccine and vaccine production combination was the fourth ethical skepticism that engaged public opinion [83] .…”

Argument by Association: On the Transmissibility of Commitment in Public Political Arguments

“…Looking at arguments by association from the lens of the argumentative potential (Mohammed 2019a, b;Mohammed 2022;Mohammed & Rossi 2022; see also Kjeldsen 2017; Serafis 2022) is crucial for strengthening the justification of commitment transmissibility between argumentative agents. Generally speaking, the argumentative potential refers to the implicit argumentative meaning that may be communicated by a certain discourse or parts of it.…”

Caring for Daughters with Anorexia Nervosa: A Qualitative Study on Parents’ Representation of the Problem and Management of the Disorder

“…Within AN, anthropological studies have highlighted how cultural values and practices can inform specialist treatment settings for EDs and can inform treatment dynamics and potentially cure rates. Hospital spaces themselves, such as patient bedrooms in inpatient units, can potentially represent a replica of patient bedrooms at home, which are richly associated with the rituals and private cognitions that perpetuate AN [ 43 , 44 ]. At the same time, the context, as well as social and cultural dimensions, can intervene in influencing the same theories on AN, the models of intervention and treatment of the disorder [ 45 ].…”

“…This hinges on the general idea that it is possible to suspend the belief that the categories proposed to describe problems and solutions receive their legitimacy from the observation and examination of “reality”. It is to engage in a careful understanding of the context (subjective, intersubjective, cultural) which gives meaning to a certain way of feeling and acting, even when this sense escapes the scrutiny of logical–analytical thought [ 44 ].…”