1991
DOI: 10.1016/0167-2789(91)90012-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Arnol'd cat: Failure of the correspondence principle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
101
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Its dynamics are algorithmically equivalent to classical motion on a regular lattice, whose spacing is inversely proportional to the Planck constant [3,4]. When the spacing diminishes, the lattice becomes denser in continuous, classical phase-space.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its dynamics are algorithmically equivalent to classical motion on a regular lattice, whose spacing is inversely proportional to the Planck constant [3,4]. When the spacing diminishes, the lattice becomes denser in continuous, classical phase-space.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the spacing diminishes, the lattice becomes denser in continuous, classical phase-space. Yet, it has long been recognized that chaos cannot be naively revived in such a limit procedure [4,5,6]. A way out of this impasse is obtained by randomly perturbing the dynamics [7]: is this addition enough to bring back the full algorithmic content, that is the distinctive signature of chaos [8] ?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniform hyperbolicity also precludes any dependence on initial conditions. The dynamics derive from the kicked oscillator Hamiltonian [14] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our present work builds on our earlier work on Finite Quantum Mechanics (FQM) where we introduced the discretized toroidal membrane, Z N × Z N [31] which elucidates the matrix model truncation of the membrane dynamics [32,33] rendering the discrete membrane as a quantum phase space of finite quantum mechanics, with canonical transformation group SL(2, Z N ) [34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Jhep02(2014)109mentioning
confidence: 99%