Relying primarily on indirect putative indices of fetal testosterone (T) exposure (2D:4D digit ratios and otoacoustic emissions), Breedlove (2017) summarizes literature supporting the conclusion that lesbian women, on average, are exposed to greaterprenatal androgen than are straight women. By contrast, Breedlove argues that homosexual orientation in men (based on these same putative retrospective markers of fetal androgen action) cannot be easily explained by a reduction in prenatal androgen. Instead, Breedlove suggests that there may be, as yet unidentified, brainspecific reductions in response to androgen in male fetuses who grow up to be gay. Breedlove argues persuasively that the nonhuman animal literature on the critical role of perinatal testosterone exposure in forming male-typical forebrain and/or spinal cord nuclear volume, neuronal number, and neuronal phenotype remains the bedrock reason for suspecting that there must be some link between fetal and/or early postnatal variations in circulating testosterone's neural actions and adult sexual orientation in humans. He points out that in the few documented human examples of sex differences in brain and spinal cord neuronal morphology, the size of the sex differences never approach the magnitude of the homologous morphological sex differences seen in several rodent species as well as ferrets and sheep. Breedlove also alludes to the large animalliterature on sex differences in behavior (usually without specifying types of behavior), saying: ''Having spent most of my adult life investigating sex differences in behaviorin non-humananimals,Ihavewondered whethertheresults of animal studies have any relevance to sex differences in human behavior. '' In so far as the topic of Breedlove's article concerns prenatal influences on human sexual orientation, we were surprised that he barely mentions a sizable animal literature on the hormonal and neural control of male-typical, as well as female-typical, sexual partner preference. The single such animal study cited (Roselli, Larkin, Resko, Stellflug, & Stormshak, 2004) described the interesting correlative observation that a minority (*8% of the population screened) of male sheep (rams), when given a choice betweenmountinganestrouseweoranotherram,showedahomosexual preference and chose to mount the ram. The volume of a sexually dimorphic nucleus (ovine SDN) located at the border of the medial preoptic area/anterior hypothalamus (mPOA/AH) was significantly greater in heterosexual (gynephilic) rams than in ewes. By contrast, the volume of the SDN in androphilic (homosexual) rams was significantly lower than in gynephilic rams, although its volume was still significantly greater than the SDN of ewes.As Breedlove points out, it has been difficult to establish either a correlational or a causal linkage between observed sex dimorphisms in forebrain nuclear volume and the capacity of male and female animals to display mating or any other type of social behavior. This is especially true if one restricts the analysis to the mo...