2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99996-8_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Artifact Subspace Reconstruction (ASR) for EEG Signal Correction. A Comparative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the data are processed in chunks of 500 ms. As a result, ASR has a very short processing delay and relatively low computational complexity. It is well-suited for online applications and it has been shown to perform very well on EEG data in different recording conditions (Arad et al, 2018; Kim and Kim, 2018; Plechawska-Wojcik et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, the data are processed in chunks of 500 ms. As a result, ASR has a very short processing delay and relatively low computational complexity. It is well-suited for online applications and it has been shown to perform very well on EEG data in different recording conditions (Arad et al, 2018; Kim and Kim, 2018; Plechawska-Wojcik et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For data cleaning, EEGLAB plugin clean_rawdata() was applied including Artifact Subspace Reconstruction was applied to reduce high-amplitude artifacts (Blum et al, 2019;Chang et al, 2018Chang et al, , 2020Gabard-Durnam et al, 2018;Kothe and Makeig, 2013;Mullen et al, 2015;Plechawska-Wojcik M, 2019). The parameters used were: flat line removal, 10 s; electrode correlation, 0.7; ASR, 20; window rejection, 0.5.…”
Section: Eeg Recording and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Removes the bursts via Artifact Subspace Reconstructionapplies PCA decomposition to the channels in sliding window and rejects and reconstructs the components for which the standard deviation differs from the most representative part of the signal. The standard deviation threshold was set at 5 (Mullen et al, 2013;Plechawska-Wojcik et al, 2018). 5Removes the unrepaired windows-a sliding window of 1 s and 66% overlap deletes the windows that contain more than four "bad channels."…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%