The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: A Qualified Success for Beijing's Economic Statecraft

Abstract

In 2013, China's growing economic capacities motivated Beijing to launch a multilateral bank to advance its diplomatic agenda. Scholars are still debating precisely what Beijing seeks to accomplish through the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB). This article surveys the key literature on the AIIB, identifying twenty scholarly interpretations of Beijing's strategic goals. The purpose of this research is to understand Beijing's initial design for this bank and evaluate whether this new multilateral development bank can function as an effective instrument for Beijing's economic statecraft. Over its first five years, as an economic tool for Beijing, the AIIB has performed quite remarkably well. The bank not only operates smoothly, generating a reasonable amount in net income for its shareholders, but also serves Beijing's strategic purposes in expanding China's regional influence, enhancing its international status, and ascending toward global leadership.

Multilateralism and Soft Power Made-in-China: (re)Adjusting Role Conception to Meet International Expectations

“…As by-products of the BRI, one could highlight the establishment of the New Development Bank (known as the BRICs Bank), the Silk Road Fund, and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) -all launched in 2014. These institutions provide compelling evidence of China's commitment to multilateralism [34]. Whether coincidental or not, as noted by Wihtol (2019) [85] "2014 marked the 70th anniversary of the Bretton Woods conference, and it was a turning point for the global financial architecture".…”

Assessing the Belt and Road Initiative’s Impact: A Multi-Regression Model Based on Economic Interaction

“…Proposed by President Xi Jinping of the People's Republic of China in 2013, the Belt and Road Initiative aims to expand trade routes along the ancient Silk Road, an ancient trade route that used to connect East and West. The initiative is part of China's strategy to realize openness, regional security, regional co-construction, and win-win cooperation [3,4].…”

Las Lógicas De La Diplomacia Económica Instrumental en Las Relaciones Internacionales Contemporáneas (2017-2022)

“…La expansión económica de China, en particular, ha sido objeto de varios estudios en clave geoeconómica (Haga 2021; Urdinez, Mouron, Schenoni y de Oliveira 2016); en tanto que la revisión de la política económica de EEUU y su interés estratégico en sectores claves como el tecnológico ha sido conceptualizado bajo los términos de economic statecraft y geoeconomía por Weiss (2021) y Wigell (2018), entre otros. Adriansen y Postnikov (2022) han analizado los elementos geoeconómicos de la estrategia europea de negociaciones comerciales, en tanto que Borchert, et.…”