2012
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Asp299Gly Polymorphism Alters TLR4 Signaling by Interfering with Recruitment of MyD88 and TRIF

Abstract: Asp299Gly (D299G) and, to a lesser extent, Thr399Ile (T399I) TLR4 polymorphisms have been associated with Gram negative sepsis and other infectious diseases, but the mechanisms by which they affect TLR4 signaling are unclear. In this study, we determined the impact of the D299G and T399I polymorphisms on TLR4 expression, interactions with myeloid differentiation factor 2 (MD2), LPS binding, and LPS-mediated activation of the MyD88- and TIR domain-containing adapter inducing IFN-β (TRIF) signaling pathways. Com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
5
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further evidence in support of our observations demonstrated that a truncated intracellular domain of RAGE altered cell migration and adhesion and impaired RAGE-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2, p38 and JNK (27). Canonical TLR4 activation recruits intracellular adaptor proteins MYD88 and TIRAP inducing interferon-␤ (TRIF) downstream of the TLR4 complex (15). In our studies we used CLI-095 to block the intracellular binding site for these adaptor proteins to blunt TLR4-mediated signaling (41).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Further evidence in support of our observations demonstrated that a truncated intracellular domain of RAGE altered cell migration and adhesion and impaired RAGE-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2, p38 and JNK (27). Canonical TLR4 activation recruits intracellular adaptor proteins MYD88 and TIRAP inducing interferon-␤ (TRIF) downstream of the TLR4 complex (15). In our studies we used CLI-095 to block the intracellular binding site for these adaptor proteins to blunt TLR4-mediated signaling (41).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Confocal Microscopy-Confocal microscopy was performed as described previously (43). In brief, cells were seeded (4 ϫ 10 5 cells) on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips (Fischer Scientific) in phenol-free complete DMEM and cultured for 20 h. Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) transfection reagent followed by gentle washing and recovery for 48 h. Cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and mounted onto glass slides using a 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]-octane-based antifade fluorescent mounting medium.…”
Section: S-[23-bis(palmitoyloxy)-(2-rs)-propyl]-cys-ser-lys(4)-oh (Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies using mouse strains deficient in TLR4 signaling (10)(11)(12), TLR4 expression (10,(13)(14)(15)(16), or using inhibitors of TLR function in wild type (WT) mice (1,17) confirmed that TLR4 contributes to bacterial clearance and the host inflammatory response in the setting of Gram-negative bacterial infection. Furthermore, the TLR4 Asp 299 Gly polymorphism, which results in depressed LPS-TLR4 signaling (18), is associated with increased susceptibility to Gramnegative infections in humans (19). Therefore, the TLR4-dependent response of individual cell types in the setting of bacterial sepsis is likely to be determined by the functional role of each cell type in the overall host response.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%