The Assessment of the Possibilities for the Lithuanian Fleet to Comply With New Environmental Requirements

Panasiuk, Irina; Lebedevas, Sergėjus

doi:10.3846/16484142.2014.896828

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Cao et al [25] analyzed the environmental benefits of shore power using an economic cost method, and tested the feasibility of the shore power. With regard to LSFO, Panasiuk and Lebedevas [26] compared the advantages and disadvantages of using LSFO and scrubber in ECAs. A cost-benefit analysis of the limit provisions which required the sulfur to be no more than 0.1% in the Baltic Sea ECAs was performed in [27].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Choice of Emission Control Technology in Port Areas with Customers’ Low-Carbon Preference

Zhou

Zhang

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The choice of emission control technology in a port supply chain under a cap-and-trade scheme considering low-carbon preferences of customers, is explored in this study. In port areas, the port supply chain consisting of one port and one ship can adopt either shore power (SP) or low sulfur fuel oil (LSFO) to reduce emissions. The economic and social performance of the port supply chain when either SP or LSFO is implemented is compared under three different game models (port-leader Stackelberg game, ship-leader Stackelberg game and the Nash game). The obtained results show that the profits and emissions in the Nash game are higher than those in the other two games. When environmental concern is relatively small, social welfare in the Nash game is the highest, while social welfare in the one-party-dominant structure is superior to that in the Nash structure, under high environmental concern. When the customers’ low-carbon preferences and carbon prices are low, both the supply chain’s profits and carbon emissions when LSFO is used are higher than those from using SP. From the perspective of social welfare maximization, in general, LSFO is preferred when carbon price, customers’ low-carbon preference and environmental concern are all low or are all high. Otherwise, SP is the optimal decision. The findings can provide insights for governments in formulating emission control policies according to their own interests.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Choice of Emission Control Technology in Port Areas with Customers’ Low-Carbon Preference

Zhou

Zhang

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bakar et al [34] provided a data-driven berthing prediction method for ship suing SP with various models such as artifcial neural networks, decision tree, random forest, multiple linear regression, and extreme gradient boosting. Concerning low sulfur fuel oil, Panasiuk and Lebedevas [35] compared the advantages and disadvantages of using LSFO and scrubber in ECAs. Xing et al [36] carry out A technological review to identify the most promising alternative marine fuels taking into account the reduction of nitrogen oxides, carbon dioxide emissions, and sulfur oxides as well as sustainability.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decisions on Technologies for Emissions Control in Port Areas under Subsidy and Low-Carbon Preferences of Customers

Zhou

2022

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The emission control technologies decisions of port and shipping enterprises under subsidy and customers’ low-carbon preferences are discussed from a supply chain perspective. The game models are established under three game models (port-leader Stackelberg game, ship-leader Stackelberg game, and Nash game). The obtained results show that the impact of subsidy and low-carbon preference on demand in its pricing always is considered by the leader in the port supply chain. The profits and emissions in the Nash game are higher than that in the Stackelberg game. When subsidies and customers’ low-carbon preferences are low, the supply chain’s overall profits of using low sulfur oil are higher than that of using shore power. But the supply chain’s carbon emissions of adopting low sulfur oil are also higher than that of adopting shore power. When subsidies and low-carbon preferences of customers are high, the supply chain’s overall profits of using shore power are higher than that of using low sulfur oil. But the supply chain’s carbon emissions of adopting shore power are also higher than that of adopting low sulfur oil. When subsidy and low-carbon preference of customers are in the appropriate(medial) range, the supply chain would choose shore power to reduce emissions from the perspective of profits, and the whole carbon emissions of using shore power are lower than that of using low sulfur oil, so the regulator(government) and enterprises can achieve a win-win situation. Hence for a regulator who has to balance emission control and enterprises’ profits, implementing moderate subsidy within the appropriate range is the better strategy.

show abstract

“…Within the EU27 there is large market segregation between Core Countries and Newly Associated States (Panasiuk and Lebedevas, 2014). For instance the market penetration of greener vehicles is slower in Hungary (Szendrő et al, 2012) (Fig.…”

Section: Fig 6 Distance Based Emission Of New Cars In Eu27 Source: mentioning

confidence: 99%

Environmental Comparism of Road and Railway Transport: A Case Study in Hungary

Török¹

2014

IJTTE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The influence of mankind around the world is unquestionable. Resources are used and pollution is made during the transportation of human capital, raw materials, semifinal and final products. Nowadays pollution is a key factor in the progress towards sustainability in all sectors. Recently only the transport sector has not been able to fulfil the requirements and lower its emission in Europe. Further on there is a global pressure on modal shift from road to rail. But the question is still not answered whether the rail transport pollutions less? This article aims to present a method of analysis and to answer these questions in the case of Hungary.

show abstract

The Assessment of the Possibilities for the Lithuanian Fleet to Comply With New Environmental Requirements

Cited by 8 publications

References 9 publications

Choice of Emission Control Technology in Port Areas with Customers’ Low-Carbon Preference

Choice of Emission Control Technology in Port Areas with Customers’ Low-Carbon Preference

Decisions on Technologies for Emissions Control in Port Areas under Subsidy and Low-Carbon Preferences of Customers

Environmental Comparism of Road and Railway Transport: A Case Study in Hungary

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About