2014
DOI: 10.1080/07317115.2014.886653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Assessment of Treatment Integrity in a Cognitive Behavioral Telephone Intervention Study With Dementia Caregivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For further information about the treatment, see Wilz et al (2011) and Schink€ othe and Wilz (2014).…”
Section: Methods Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For further information about the treatment, see Wilz et al (2011) and Schink€ othe and Wilz (2014).…”
Section: Methods Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interrater-reliability in this study was moderate to excellent for individual items (ICC (2,2) , range: .64À.95, where ICC is intraclass correlation) and good for the overall score (ICC (2,2) D .85). For further information about the items of the scale, see Schink€ othe and Wilz (2014).…”
Section: Adherence Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The items developed for the adherence scale are based on the intervention modules described in the manual. Conceptualization of the competence scale is based on our previous studies [ 23 , 61 , 62 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the present analysis, only sessions with caregivers in the intervention group (n = 129) were considered. Therapy sessions during which grief and loss were addressed were identified via a 2-tiered process: First, therapists’ session protocols and ratings 30 on a newly developed adherence scale, which included the application of interventions targeted at loss and change, and an adapted German version of the Cognitive Therapy Scale , which assesses therapeutic competences and the application of cognitive–behavioral techniques, were searched for interventions regarding grief, loss, and change. Second, 2 independent raters (the first and second authors) listened to all identified therapy sessions and selected sessions for analysis if their content reflected relationship losses (ie, relationship dynamic change, loss of companionship, communication, and support 7 ) and associated emotions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%