Objective
To map current literature on the educational use of extended reality (XR) in Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) to inform teaching and research.
Study Design
Scoping Review.
Methods
A scoping review was conducted, identifying literature through MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science databases. Findings were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for scoping review checklist. Studies were included if they involved OHNS trainees or medical students who used XR for an educational purpose in OHNS. XR was defined as: fully‐immersive virtual reality (VR) using head‐mounted displays (HMDs), non‐immersive and semi‐immersive VR, augmented reality (AR), or mixed reality (MR). Data on device use were extracted, and educational outcomes were analyzed according to Kirkpatrick's evaluation framework.
Results
Of the 1,434 unique abstracts identified, 40 articles were included. All articles reported on VR; none discussed AR or MR. Twenty‐nine articles were categorized as semi‐immersive, none used occlusive HMDs therefore, none met modern definitions of immersive VR. Most studies (29 of 40) targeted temporal bone surgery. Using the Kirkpatrick four‐level evaluation model, all studies were limited to level‐1 (learner reaction) or level‐2 (knowledge or skill performance).
Conclusions
Current educational applications of XR in OHNS are limited to VR, do not fully immerse participants and do not assess higher‐level learning outcomes. The educational OHNS community would benefit from a shared definition for VR technology, assessment of skills transfer (level‐3 and higher), and deliberate testing of AR, MR, and procedures beyond temporal bone surgery. Laryngoscope, 133:227–234, 2023