2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association between anthropomorphism of nature and pro-environmental variables: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
43
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in line with other studies showing that humans are more willing to invest in the conservation of species that are phylogenetically closer to humans and thus more likely to be anthropomorphized [22][23][24][25][26]. In other countries, the link between anthropomorphism, mutualism and/or better attitude toward animals is also relatively well established (see [27]). Anthropomorphism, for instance, predicted students' intentions to become vegetarian and vegan in Spain [28], worse attitudes toward meat consumption in the USA [29], and a better attitude toward several species in the UK [30].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These results are in line with other studies showing that humans are more willing to invest in the conservation of species that are phylogenetically closer to humans and thus more likely to be anthropomorphized [22][23][24][25][26]. In other countries, the link between anthropomorphism, mutualism and/or better attitude toward animals is also relatively well established (see [27]). Anthropomorphism, for instance, predicted students' intentions to become vegetarian and vegan in Spain [28], worse attitudes toward meat consumption in the USA [29], and a better attitude toward several species in the UK [30].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…One of the main strengths of the present study is that it is amongst the first research to investigate anthropomorphism of nature and pro-environmental support, through the novel context of the coronavirus pandemic. The current body of research is small, with a recent review noting that only 15 studies of good quality have examined the relationship between anthropomorphism and pro-environmental variables ( Williams et al, 2021 ). Moreover, although some past studies have examined anthropomorphism of nature ( Tam, 2019 ; Tam, 2013b), the majority have used animals as targets (e.g., Wang & Bassow, 2019 ) and little is known about the moderators of the relationship between the anthropomorphism of nature and pro-environmental outcomes ( Williams et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, as we have only cross-sectional data, we can make no claims about the causal relations between variables. Finally, the use of bespoke measures for the predictor and outcome variables is a limitation, particularly as this is a widespread practice in research on anthropomorphism and pro-environmental variables ( Williams et al, 2021 ). This research is also limited as we did not examine participants’ attributions of the origins of the COVID-19 virus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropomorphic metaphors, as all conflictual metaphors, are open to interpretation, hence their reproduction in the TT is reliant on the translator's cultural framework and translation strategy. Firstly, anthropomorphism entails subjective assessment of similarity (Williams et al, 2021). Secondly, the need to access a culturally salient understanding of the notion underlying a metaphor, without which the transfer cannot take place, confirms the intrinsically cultural nature of anthropomorphism (Dancygier & Sweetser, 2014, p. 141).…”
Section: Anthropomorphism and Anthropomorphic Metaphorsmentioning
confidence: 99%