2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association between fertility treatments and the incidence of paediatric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, a Danish population-based registry study found higher risk of any childhood cancer after FET than after spontaneous conception, but the result was based on only 14 cases (HR 2.43, 95% CI 1.44 to 4.11) [ 22 ]. Studies on childhood cancer after ART were recently summarized in a systematic review [ 55 ], concluding that FET may be related to a higher risk of pediatric cancer. In an even more recent study from Israel, with a limited number of children, a higher risk of cancer was found in children born after fresh transfer [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, a Danish population-based registry study found higher risk of any childhood cancer after FET than after spontaneous conception, but the result was based on only 14 cases (HR 2.43, 95% CI 1.44 to 4.11) [ 22 ]. Studies on childhood cancer after ART were recently summarized in a systematic review [ 55 ], concluding that FET may be related to a higher risk of pediatric cancer. In an even more recent study from Israel, with a limited number of children, a higher risk of cancer was found in children born after fresh transfer [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies indicated that ART conception increases the risk of childhood cancers, [15][16][17][18][19] but others found no association. [20][21][22][23] This discrepancy may be due to several factors. First, different reference groups were used in these studies, and very few studies have differentiated children of parents who had an infertility diagnosis with or without fertility treatments from those who delivered after natural conception to provide an appropriate comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, only a few studies adjusted for potential confounders or adjusted for very few confounders. [15][16][17][19][20][21][22][23] In circumstances in which both exposure and outcome are rare events, few studies used a nationwide or large population-based design to reduce selection bias and avoid the limited number of exposed cases. 15,17,18,21 Finally, to our knowledge, no previous study explored whether perinatal outcomes mediate the association between mode of conception and childhood cancers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of frozen embryo transfer, this cohort study includes slow freezing and cryopreservation, was significantly associated with an increased risk of cancer in children, mainly including leukemia and neurological tumors [ 37 ]. In 2020, the European Cancer Research Center also clarified that frozen embryo transfer was associated with an increased incidence of cancer in offspring [ 38 ]. Professor Huang Hefeng, a member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, has long been concerned about the safety and genetic effects of human ART, and a recent study by this team found that male mouse offspring transferred after freezing–thawing showed impaired glucose metabolism, mainly manifesting as insulin resistance [ 39 ].…”
Section: Reflections On Fertility Preservation In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%