1986
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860815)58:4<924::aid-cncr2820580420>3.0.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association of specific “favorable” cytogenetic abnormalities with secondary leukemia

Abstract: Eight patients with secondary leukemia and specific cytogenetic abnormalities involving inversion of chromosome 16, or translocations between chromosomes 15 and 17, or 8 and 21, are presented. Seven of them (87%) achieved complete remission with chemotherapy. The occurrence of these karyotypes, which is unusual in secondary leukemia, and the favorable response to chemotherapy are discussed in relation to the pathogenesis of the disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, 11 were excluded from analysis for the following reasons: insufficient details available in two, 17,18 no anti-leukemic treatment administered in three (including current case 2), 19,20 prior radiation therapy only in three, 13,21,22 aberrant breakpoints in one 23 unacknowledged multiple publication in one, 19,24 and finally, one case included in an earlier review (patient number 5 from Quesnel et al 12 ) could not be verified from the primary reference cited. 25 Thus, 25 cases with treatment and follow-up data were available for analysis 6,[12][13][14]19,[26][27][28][29] (Table 1). Follow-up information on the six cases from the MD Anderson Cancer Centre was updated to May 1999.…”
Section: Previously Reported Cases Of S-aml With Inv(16)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of these, 11 were excluded from analysis for the following reasons: insufficient details available in two, 17,18 no anti-leukemic treatment administered in three (including current case 2), 19,20 prior radiation therapy only in three, 13,21,22 aberrant breakpoints in one 23 unacknowledged multiple publication in one, 19,24 and finally, one case included in an earlier review (patient number 5 from Quesnel et al 12 ) could not be verified from the primary reference cited. 25 Thus, 25 cases with treatment and follow-up data were available for analysis 6,[12][13][14]19,[26][27][28][29] (Table 1). Follow-up information on the six cases from the MD Anderson Cancer Centre was updated to May 1999.…”
Section: Previously Reported Cases Of S-aml With Inv(16)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Subsequently, the strong association between abnormalities of chromosome 11q23 at the site of the MLL gene, 4 and prior exposure to the epipodophyllotoxins was clearly delineated. 3,5 Throughout this period, with some notable exceptions, 6,7 it was generally held that the prognostically favorable balanced translocations, particularly inv(16), were not within the spectrum of chromosomal abnormalities caused by prior cytotoxic therapies. 8,9 However, in the last 5 years there has been an increasing recognition of the occurrence, albeit uncommon, of inv (16) in patients with secondary AML (s-AML).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have reported an increased risk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) after treatment of BC [4,5]. Support for this association has been strengthened by the description of signature chromosomal aberrations found in bone marrow specimens from patients with secondary AML and MDS [8][9][10][11][12]. Although several studies describe the increased risk of leukemia for up to 10-15 years after BC diagnosis [5,13,14], data beyond 15 years are not as readily available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another subtype, which is induced by topoisomerase II inhibitors including etoposide or anthracyclines, has no preleukemic phase, often demonstrates balanced translocations such as t(9;11), t(8;21), t (15;17), and, like de novo AML with the same karyotypes, responds well to conventional chemotherapies (2)(3)(4)(5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%