2019
DOI: 10.1111/aswp.12174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Associations between income, informal social networks, and health among older adults in South Korea: A multi‐group analysis based on the level of age‐friendly environments

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to empirically investigate the role of age‐friendly environments (AFE) on the associations between income, informal social networks, and health among South Korean older adults. We used data from the “2017 Age Integration Survey” collected nationally and ultimately analyzed 615 older adults over 50 years of age. Structural equation modeling and multi‐group analysis were used to test the hypothesis. Specifically, two groups of perceived levels of AFE (top 25%, bottom 25%) were co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to formal networks, participants’ informal networks, defined as networks comprised of primary or proximal members who you exchange unpaid support with (i.e., family members and friends) ( Kim et al, 2019 ), provided more diverse types of social support, including companionship as well as emotional, informational, and instrumental support. In particular, participants relied heavily on their peers (i.e., network members sharing a similar age, disability, gender, or other circumstance), who were perceived as having more tacit understanding and empathy for participants’ needs and experiences (see Table 4 , for examples, of the comprehensive range of social supports provided by informal networks).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to formal networks, participants’ informal networks, defined as networks comprised of primary or proximal members who you exchange unpaid support with (i.e., family members and friends) ( Kim et al, 2019 ), provided more diverse types of social support, including companionship as well as emotional, informational, and instrumental support. In particular, participants relied heavily on their peers (i.e., network members sharing a similar age, disability, gender, or other circumstance), who were perceived as having more tacit understanding and empathy for participants’ needs and experiences (see Table 4 , for examples, of the comprehensive range of social supports provided by informal networks).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible reason for these conflicting results may be that income is mediated by a variety of other SES factors, and that single measures of SES are insufficient to capture SES in old age reliably and are not enough to explain health status variations fully [ 5 ]. For instance, area-based studies demonstrate that the socioeconomic conditions of localities also affect older adults’ health in addition to individual conditions [ 6 , 7 ]. Other socioeconomic issues such as employment, education, housing, segregation, and mobility can also make a difference in the health status of older adults [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%