2021
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1937693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The associations of circulating common and uncommon polyunsaturated fatty acids and modification effects on dietary quality with all-cause and disease-specific mortality in NHANES 2003–2004 and 2011–2012

Abstract: Background Associations of dietary or supplementary intake of several unsaturated fatty acids and mortality have been widely studied but the results were still hitherto inconsistent or limited. It is still need to explore the effects of these fatty acids by using the objective biomarkers. Objective We aimed to investigate the relevancy of several serum n-3 and n-6 fatty acids with all-cause and disease-specific mortality to confirm their health effects and effects on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following covariates were used in our study: age; sex was categorized as male and female; participants’ self-reported race was categorized as Mexican American, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and other races; height and weight were assessed by body mass index (BMI), and we calculated participants’ BMI using the following formula: based on weight (kg)/height 2 (m); smoking status was assessed by the question “Ever smoked at least 100 cigarettes in your lifetime?” and was categorized as yes, no, or don’t know; drinking status was assessed by the question “Have you had at least 12 alcoholic drinks in your lifetime?” and was categorized as yes, no, or don’t know; waist circumference was estimated in centimeters; physical activity was assessed by the question “Have you done any physical activity in the past 7 days?” and was categorized as yes, no, or don’t know; monthly household income was categorized as $0 to $4,999, $5000 to $9,999, $10 000 to $14,999, $15 000 to $19,999, $20 000 to $24 999, and don’t know; the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) [ 23-25 ] is based on a comprehensive review of the original Healthy Eating Index and subsequent studies that included 11 food components (fruits, vegetables, whole grains, sugary drinks and juices, nuts and legumes, red and processed meats, trans fats, long-chain n-3 fats, polyunsaturated fatty acids, sodium, and alcohol), and showed associations with chronic disease risk and even with total and cause-specific mortality [ 26 ]. The scores for each item were calculated by dividing the actual intake by the maximum criterion and multiplying by the full score for that item, with each component of the food ranging from 0 (unhealthy) to 10 (healthiest) and the total score ranging from 0 to 110.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following covariates were used in our study: age; sex was categorized as male and female; participants’ self-reported race was categorized as Mexican American, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and other races; height and weight were assessed by body mass index (BMI), and we calculated participants’ BMI using the following formula: based on weight (kg)/height 2 (m); smoking status was assessed by the question “Ever smoked at least 100 cigarettes in your lifetime?” and was categorized as yes, no, or don’t know; drinking status was assessed by the question “Have you had at least 12 alcoholic drinks in your lifetime?” and was categorized as yes, no, or don’t know; waist circumference was estimated in centimeters; physical activity was assessed by the question “Have you done any physical activity in the past 7 days?” and was categorized as yes, no, or don’t know; monthly household income was categorized as $0 to $4,999, $5000 to $9,999, $10 000 to $14,999, $15 000 to $19,999, $20 000 to $24 999, and don’t know; the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) [ 23-25 ] is based on a comprehensive review of the original Healthy Eating Index and subsequent studies that included 11 food components (fruits, vegetables, whole grains, sugary drinks and juices, nuts and legumes, red and processed meats, trans fats, long-chain n-3 fats, polyunsaturated fatty acids, sodium, and alcohol), and showed associations with chronic disease risk and even with total and cause-specific mortality [ 26 ]. The scores for each item were calculated by dividing the actual intake by the maximum criterion and multiplying by the full score for that item, with each component of the food ranging from 0 (unhealthy) to 10 (healthiest) and the total score ranging from 0 to 110.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors include age, sex, existing comorbidities, targeted symptoms, blood biomarkers, and specific treatment protocols, before fully endorsing the use of omega-3 PUFAs either as an independent treatment or in conjunction with other medications for migraine management ( 80 ). Furthermore, conducting risk–benefit evaluations of omega-3 PUFA administration is crucial, aimed at identifying patient groups for whom omega-3 PUFA therapy would present an optimal risk–benefit balance ( 97 ).…”
Section: Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%