“…The greater viral survival advantage of APOBEC3G-Vif neutralization is suggested by the following: (i) APOBEC3G is more likely to generate stop codons than APOBEC3F and other deaminases (3,12), (ii) the processive single-stranded DNA scanning behavior of APOBEC3G ("jumping" and "sliding") increases its mutagenic potential relative to that of APOBEC3F (predominately "jumping") (80), (iii) most (81)(82)(83)(84)(85)(86) although not all (87) studies demonstrate that APOBEC3G expression levels correlate inversely with viral load and disease progression in adults, (iv) APOBEC3G expression levels are higher in long-term nonprogressors than in uninfected controls and lowest in rapid progressors (81), (v) APOBEC3G mRNA is expressed at higher levels than that of APOBEC3F in lymphocytes and lymphoid tissue (88,89), and APOBEC3F is not expressed in monocytes/macrophages and dendritic cells, whereas APOBEC3G is (71), (vi) APOBEC3F and other deaminases have little or no antiviral effect in primary cells or when expressed at similar levels in cell lines (68,69), although a cumulative antiviral effect of APOBEC3F, albeit less than that of APOBEC3G, was observed in a long-term (27 days) culture of lab-adapted virus in CD4 ϩ T cells and monocyte/macrophages (4), (vii) APOBEC3F has no significant effect on virus infectivity when stably expressed in HeLa cells, even though it was packaged into nascent virions (68), (viii) the protein expression levels of APOBEC3G are higher than those of APOBEC3F in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from different donors, although the use of different antibodies precluded an accurate quantification of protein expression (69), and (viiii) APOBEC3G had a stronger antiviral effect than APOBEC3F when they were expressed as fusions with the FLAG-epitope at the same levels in cell lines (90). We acknowledge that there may be a discordance between mRNA and protein expression levels and antiviral effects and that these studies do not analyze the degree to which each APOBEC3 inhibits reverse transcription, stimulates cDNA degradation, or inhibits integration; however, these limitations do not challenge the conclusion that APOBEC3G activity is more deleterious to HIV survival than the activities of other deaminases (4).…”