2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/754/1/44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Astralux Large M-Dwarf Multiplicity Survey

Abstract: We present the results of an extensive high-resolution imaging survey of M-dwarf multiplicity using the Lucky Imaging technique. The survey made use of the AstraLux Norte camera at the Calar Alto 2.2m telescope and the AstraLux Sur camera at the ESO New Technology Telescope in order to cover nearly the full sky. In total, 761 stars were observed (701 M-type and 60 late K-type), among which 182 new and 37 previously known companions were detected in 205 systems. Most of the targets have been observed during two… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

31
364
4
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(400 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
31
364
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This continuity across the mass-limit between stars and BDs was apparently supported by recent investigations of the late M-dwarf binary population in the Galactic field. In a lucky-imaging survey, the AstraLux survey for earlier (Janson et al 2012) and later M-dwarfs (the two studies overlap somewhat in mass) showed separation distributions significantly narrower than that for solar-type stars, confirming results from a previous lucky-imaging survey (Bergfors et al 2010). For the late M-dwarfs the separation distribution lies remarkably close to the one for BDs in the Galactic field, suggesting a common origin.…”
Section: Width Of the Separation Distributions Of Galactic Field Binasupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This continuity across the mass-limit between stars and BDs was apparently supported by recent investigations of the late M-dwarf binary population in the Galactic field. In a lucky-imaging survey, the AstraLux survey for earlier (Janson et al 2012) and later M-dwarfs (the two studies overlap somewhat in mass) showed separation distributions significantly narrower than that for solar-type stars, confirming results from a previous lucky-imaging survey (Bergfors et al 2010). For the late M-dwarfs the separation distribution lies remarkably close to the one for BDs in the Galactic field, suggesting a common origin.…”
Section: Width Of the Separation Distributions Of Galactic Field Binasupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The binary-fraction and width of the observed log-normal separation distributions in the Galactic field decline continuously with decreasing mass of the primary component (Duquennoy & Mayor 1991;Fischer & Marcy 1992;Delfosse et al 2004;Bergfors et al 2010;Raghavan et al 2010;Janson et al 2012;Jódar et al 2013;Tokovinin 2014;Duchêne & Kraus 2013;Reipurth et al 2014;Ward-Duong et al 2015;Cortés-Contreras et al 2017). This continuity across the mass-limit between stars and BDs was apparently supported by recent investigations of the late M-dwarf binary population in the Galactic field.…”
Section: Width Of the Separation Distributions Of Galactic Field Binamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Some other publications and meta-archives that we have searched for potential CARMENES targets are Kirkpatrick et al (1991), Gizis (1997), Gizis & Reid (1997), Gizis et al (2000b), Henry et al (2002Henry et al ( , 2006, Mochnacki et al (2002), Gray et al (2003), Bochanski et al (2005), Crifo et al (2005), Lodieu et al (2005), Scholz et al (2005), Phan-Bao & Bessell (2006), Reylé et al (2006), Riaz et al (2006), Caballero (2007Caballero ( , 2009Caballero ( , 2012, Gatewood & Coban (2009), Shkolnik et al (2009, 2012, Bergfors et al (2010), Johnson et al (2010), Boyd et al (2011), Irwin et al (2011), West et al (2011, Avenhaus et al (2012), Deacon et al (2012), Janson et al (2012, 2014), Frith et al (2013, Jódar et al (2013), Malo et al (2013), Aberasturi et al (2014), Dieterich et al (2014), Riedel et al (2014), Yi et al (2014), , and the DwarfArchive at http://dwarfarchive.org. (b) PMSU: Reid et al (1995Reid et al ( , 2002; Hawley et al (1996); Gizis et al (2002).…”
Section: Carmenes Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of q values for a sample of binaries is the companion mass-ratio distribution (CMRD). Several surveys in the past decades focused on the detection of stellar binaries with the purpose of characterizing the occurrence of companions and their mass distribution both in the field (e.g., Raghavan et al 2010;Janson et al 2012) and in star-forming regions (e.g., Patience et al 2002). Reggiani & Meyer (2013), in an update of Reggiani & Meyer (2011), have shown that in the field the CMRD is consistent with being universal, independent of primary mass and separation in the range covered by the observations, and can be fit by a single power-law slope dN/dq ∝ q β , with β = 0.25 ± 0.29.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%