New values are extracted for the deuteron rms matter radius rD =1.9547+0.0019 fm and the matter radial deuteron moments ( r ) = 54. 2+0. 1 fm and ( r6) = 1828+1 fm6 by analyzing the experimental ratio of (e, d) to (e,p) scattering.PACS number(s): 21.45.+v, 21.10.Ft, 25.30.8f, 27.10.+h Qk= ( )k 2k (2k +1)! (2b) The "experimental" values of CE(q ) are obtained from the experimental data of Simon et al. [3] for the ratio R(q )=GzD(q )/Gz (q ) of deuteron to proton form factors by using CE(q )=R(q )(1+x)'~[ 1+GE"(q )/GE&(q )] and the relationof Isgur et al. [8], where Gz"(q ) is the neutron form factor, r = q /4m is the Darwin-Foldy correction, and m =938.2786/Ac=4. 57491 fm ' is the proton mass.The expansion of CE(q ) in powers of q may be written for the present purpose in the form n=N There is increasing interest in the literature [1 -7] in extracting the deuteron matter radius r D by analyzing results of elastic electron scattering experiments. Some of these analyses, and also the analysis of this paper, involve fitting the "experimental" electric charge form factor CE(q ) in the low-q region by a polynomial of a certain order in q [5]; CE(q )=1+a, q +a2q + where r D = 6a, orequally wellby using a continued-fraction method [6]. We recall that the matter radial moment (r ") is the expectation value of (r/2) ":The coefficients ak are related to the radial moments ( r ")thy correct asymptotic behavior, i.e. , fitting the recent experimental values of the asymptotic S-state amplitude As=0. 8838+0.0004 fm '~o f Stoks et al. [9] and the asymptotic D /S ratio g =0.0273+0.0005 of Borbely et al. [10]. The value g = 0.0273+0.0005 of Borbely et al. [10] is consistent, in particular, with our recent prediction g=0.02701+0.00019 [11]. The MHKZ potential fits too the experimental value of the deuteron quadrupole moment (Q = 0.2860+0.0015 fm [12] and Q =0.2859+0.0003 fm [13]). Unfortunately, the values listed in Table I of Ref. [7] for the free parameters of this potential are overtruncated; therefore, they are given here in Table I with a larger number of significant figures.The values assumed for m are m =2, 3, 4, and 5 and for X is X =70. The meson exchange current (MEC) contribution is taken into account by using the correction b, rD =0.0034+0.0003 fm of Kohno [14].To make the values of ak of Eqs. (1) and (5) more consistent with the values of Cz(q ) (and hence, more accurate results would have been obtained), the point Cz(0) = 1 given by the boundary condition is used as a constraint and the analytic asymptotic contribution e= f z(u +w )dr to the normalization factor [Jo"(u +to )dr] '~i s neglected by the numerical methods producing the deuteron waves u and w of the local potential MHKZ of Ref. [7]. Deuteron properties, in particular Az and q, will not change by neglecting e, except for rD, ' it negligibly changes from 1.96316 fm to 1.96256 fm. A small change in rD would not aftect the results of the analysis (as discussed in conjunction with Table III).The results of fitting the experimental data are listed in ...