2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The at-rest earth pressure coefficient prediction using simple elasto-plastic constitutive models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the isotropic version of E‐SCLAY1 has been presented to show its similar capabilities to other previous studies (e.g. ), but even initially remoulded soils show some fabric under one dimensional compression (e.g. ), the authors believe that trying to fit K 0NC values with isotropic plastic potential surfaces is not realistic.…”
Section: Model Featuresmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the isotropic version of E‐SCLAY1 has been presented to show its similar capabilities to other previous studies (e.g. ), but even initially remoulded soils show some fabric under one dimensional compression (e.g. ), the authors believe that trying to fit K 0NC values with isotropic plastic potential surfaces is not realistic.…”
Section: Model Featuresmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Federico et al ) have used plastic potential surfaces with higher degrees of freedom to fit the desired K 0NC value. Federico et al also present a wide analysis of the analytical expressions that give K 0NC for isotropic critical state models. The analytical expression that gives the value of K 0NC for E‐SCLAY1S is derived in Appendix B.…”
Section: Model Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In odometric conditions, the increment of the gravity loading, due to the propagation of the wetting front above the reference element, forces the response in the ( p ′ , q ) plane to still move along the K 0 line (path AB ). In this branch, the stress ratio remains almost constant as the variations of the saturation degree are too small for significantly affecting the size of the Cam‐Clay ellipse; see . This means that, going from A to B , the yield surface expands following the plastic volumetric strain increments and therefore, the response of the material, in the compressibility plane, is controlled by the NCL relative to the current saturation degree.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pore‐water pressure profile is assumed hydrostatic, and the groundwater table is initially located at the lower boundary. The effective horizontal stresses σh are expressed as a function of σv through the earth pressure coefficient K 0 ; see .…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Of Water Imbibitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porewater pressure profile is assumed hydrostatic and the groundwater table is located initially at the lower boundary. The effective horizontal stresses are expressed as a function of σ v through the earth pressure coefficient K 0 , see Federico et al (2009).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%