2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The atomic-scale finite element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
156
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
156
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the atomistic-based continuum theory [1][2][3] for the mechanical properties of CNTs, the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory [4][5][6] for the bending and the critical buckling load, elastic cylindrical shell models [6][7][8] for the axial compression buckling and torsional buckling, space truss/frame models 9,10 for the Young's and shear moduli and the equivalent wall thickness, and the finite element technique, [11][12][13] which links the conventional finite element method with the atomistic-based potential for the bending and axial compression of CNTs. The results that have been obtained from these continuum models show a good agreement with experimental results or molecular dynamics simulations of single-walled carbon nanotubes ͑SWNTs͒, which indicates that with the suitable modification, conventional continuum mechanics can obtain results that are as accurate as molecular-dynamics simulation, but that are much more efficient, especially for large-scale simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the atomistic-based continuum theory [1][2][3] for the mechanical properties of CNTs, the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory [4][5][6] for the bending and the critical buckling load, elastic cylindrical shell models [6][7][8] for the axial compression buckling and torsional buckling, space truss/frame models 9,10 for the Young's and shear moduli and the equivalent wall thickness, and the finite element technique, [11][12][13] which links the conventional finite element method with the atomistic-based potential for the bending and axial compression of CNTs. The results that have been obtained from these continuum models show a good agreement with experimental results or molecular dynamics simulations of single-walled carbon nanotubes ͑SWNTs͒, which indicates that with the suitable modification, conventional continuum mechanics can obtain results that are as accurate as molecular-dynamics simulation, but that are much more efficient, especially for large-scale simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AFEM, as described by Liu et al (2004), is based on an energy approach. It requires an interatomic energy potential, U, describing local or non-local bonding forces of an atom interacting with a chosen set of other surrounding atoms.…”
Section: Atomic Scale Finite Element Methods Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational cost in modelling nanomaterials is a fundamental challenge. In order to overcome this challenge, the Atomic-scale Finite Element Method (AFEM) was developed and applied for multiscale analysis of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) by Liu and his co-authors (Liu et al, 2004;Liu et al, 2005). Presently, the AFEM can model and analyze the mechanical behavior of many materials at the nanoscale (Malakouti, 2006;Tao et al, 2016;Damasceno et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MDFEM, atoms and atomic displacements are considered as nodes and translational degrees of freedom (nodal displacements), respectively. Both first and second derivatives of system energy are used in the energy minimization computation, hence, it is faster than the standard conjugate gradient method which uses only the first order derivative of system energy as discussed by Liu, B., et al [27]. The stiffness matrices of these elements are established based upon interatomic potentials.…”
Section: Framework For Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Force field parameters are taken from the work by Sevik, C., et al [26] for B-N interactions. While DFT (Density Functional Theory) calculations and MD (Molecular Dynamics) simulations are time-consuming, MDFEMs (Molecular Dynamic Finite Element Methods), sometime known as atomic-scale finite element methods or atomistic finite element methods, have been developed to analyze nanostructured materials in a computationally efficient way [27,28]. To achieve the atomic positions of the BN-NT under specific boundary conditions, MDFEM is here adopted.…”
Section: Framework For Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%