The attitude of patients with <i>p</i>‐phenylenediamine or 2,5‐toluenediamine contact allergy to hair dyeing

Vogel, Tatiana A.; Prins, Thalina M.; Dijkstra, Arie; Coenraads, Pieter‐Jan; Schuttelaar, Marie L A

doi:10.1111/cod.12713

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Oxidative hair dyes are a well-recognised source of exposure to potent contact allergens, namely, their basic substances and coupling agents. In view of the fact that many consumers, including those sensitised, prefer to nevertheless dye their hair (even if expecting symptoms of ACD after doing so [ 161 ]), alternative preventive strategies are being developed. One approach is to protect the surrounding glabrous skin by the application of a topical antioxidant (ascorbic acid) prior to hair dyeing, as has been quite successfully tried in 2 proof-of-principle studies [ 162 , 163 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective

Uter

Werfel

White

et al. 2018

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Contact allergy is common, affecting 27% of the general population in Europe. Original publications, including case reports, published since 2016 (inclusive) were identified with the aim of collating a full review of current problems in the field. To this end, a literature search employing methods of systematic reviewing was performed in the Medline® and Web of Science™ databases on 28 January 2018, using the search terms (“contact sensitization” or “contact allergy”). Of 446 non-duplicate publications identified by above search, 147 were excluded based on scrutiny of title, abstract and key words. Of the remaining 299 examined in full text, 291 were deemed appropriate for inclusion, and main findings were summarised in topic sections. In conclusion, diverse sources of exposures to chemicals of widely-differing types and structures, continue to induce sensitisation in man and may result in allergic contact dermatitis. Many of the chemicals are “evergreen” but others are “newcomers”. Vigilance and proper investigation (patch testing) are required to detect and inform of the presence of these haptens to which our populations remain exposed.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective

Uter

Werfel

White

et al. 2018

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Allergy Alert Test for p-Phenylenediamine–Allergic Hair Dye Users

Coenraads¹,

Aberer²,

Cristaudo³

et al. 2018

Dermatitis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The AAT caused a reaction self-noticeable on the forearm in 90.5% (38/42) and behind the ear in 93% (39/42) of the PPD-positive subjects. This was objectified by a dermatological evaluation. The strength of the AAT response and the number of responding subjects increased with increasing PPD concentrations. Allergy alert test responses were also dependent on the reaction strength of the diagnostic patch test to PPD before the study; in subjects with (+++) patch test reactions, 19 of 19 were positive. All 48 control subjects were negative to the AAT. Therefore, the AAT protocol provides a signal indicative of an allergic reaction in PPD-allergic hair dye consumers.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

show abstract

Insights into hair dye use and self‐reported adverse skin reactions in the Dutch general population: A cross‐sectional questionnaire‐based study

Rosenberg,

Ofenloch,

van der Most

et al. 2024

Contact Dermatitis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundHair dyes are widely used in daily life. However, data on self‐reported adverse skin reactions are scarce.ObjectivesTo estimate the proportion of lifetime hair dye use and self‐reported adverse skin reactions in the Dutch general population, and to investigate the association between (adverse skin reactions to) hair dye use and contact allergy‐related factors.MethodsThis cross‐sectional study collected questionnaire‐derived data from the Lifelines cohort. Logistic regression analyses were conducted between (adverse skin reactions to) hair dye use and black henna tattoo use, reactions to henna tattoos, patch testing, hand eczema and an occupation as hairdresser or beautician.ResultsThe proportion of hair dye use was 63.1% of 70 987 participants, of which 6.8% experienced adverse skin reactions, mostly mild (77.7%). Hair dye users and those with skin reactions were both positively associated (p < 0.05) with female sex, middle‐age, (positive) patch test results and hairdresser or beautician occupations. Hair dye users were more likely to have had henna tattoos, and those with reactions to hair dye were more likely to have had reactions to henna tattoos.ConclusionsHair dye use is prevalent among the Dutch general population and frequently causes adverse skin reactions, especially in females who had black henna tattoos.

show abstract

The attitude of patients with p‐phenylenediamine or 2,5‐toluenediamine contact allergy to hair dyeing

Cited by 3 publications

References 7 publications

Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective

Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective

Allergy Alert Test for p-Phenylenediamine–Allergic Hair Dye Users

Insights into hair dye use and self‐reported adverse skin reactions in the Dutch general population: A cross‐sectional questionnaire‐based study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About