The Australian National Mango Breeding Project

Bally, I. S. E.; Harris, Mark Anglin; Kulkarni, V. J.; Hamilton, D.; Johnson, P. R.; Robinson, David M.; Leonardi, J.

doi:10.17660/actahortic.2000.509.22

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Pollination and Compatibility2

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2009

2018

Publication Types

Select...

Book2

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are also many instances of differential fruit set and compatibility reported between cultivars. Bally et al (2000) reported varying success rates of hybridisation between different parental combinations due to a mixture of genetic and environmental and technical factors. They were unable to produce any hybrids from controlled crossing of the cultivars 'Edward', 'Kensington Mono' and 'Magovar' as maternal parents with 'Kensington Pride'.…”

Section: Pollination and Compatibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They claimed that re-bagging damaged stigmas and styles of the crossed flowers, reducing the percentage of fruit set and the risk of pollination from unwanted pollen was very low. Another modification to the Mukherjee et al (1961) technique has been to replace re-bagging step after crossing with application of gelatinous capsules to enclose the flowers (Bally et al 2000). This technique is currently used in the Australian mango breeding programme and is described in detail in Section 2.9.7.…”

Section: Controlled Closed Pollination (Hand Pollination)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation