2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10705-006-9015-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The availability of nitrogen from sugarcane trash on contrasting soils in the wet tropics of North Queensland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
53
1
28

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
53
1
28
Order By: Relevance
“…The favorable climatic condition (higher rates of evapotranspiration) that took place during plant cane and fist ratoon development may have enhanced N mineralization of crop residues as well as increased crop yield (Figure 2). Meier et al (2006) verified lower recoveries of N from fertilizer (6 %) and trash (5 %) in sites located in northeastern of Australia, which was attributed to the higher intensity of rainfall and occasional waterlogging in sugarcane fields.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The favorable climatic condition (higher rates of evapotranspiration) that took place during plant cane and fist ratoon development may have enhanced N mineralization of crop residues as well as increased crop yield (Figure 2). Meier et al (2006) verified lower recoveries of N from fertilizer (6 %) and trash (5 %) in sites located in northeastern of Australia, which was attributed to the higher intensity of rainfall and occasional waterlogging in sugarcane fields.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As aforementioned, the low degradability of sugarcane trash is also related to its high C:N ratio, varying from 70:1 to 120:1 (Gava et al, 2005;Meier et al, 2006;Oliveira et al, 2002;Robertson and Thorburn, 2007ab) while Spain and Hodgen (1994) reported 170:1, one of the highest values in literature. Therein, lower rates of net mineralization of green harvest residues are expected in short-term, although the N supplied by fertilization LSD = least significant difference; CV % = coefficient of variation.…”
Section: N From Green Harvest Residues Recovery By Sugarcane In Threementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…trash consists of dry leaves, tops and variable amounts of cane stalks, varying from 10 to 20 t ha -1 of dry matter, presents high C to N ratio (80 to 110:1) and contains 30 to 80 kg ha -1 of N (Basanta et al, 2003;Fortes et al, 2012;Gava et al, 2003;Robertson and Thorburn, 2007a;Thorburn et al, 2005;Trivelin et al, 1995;Vitti et al, 2011). The high C/N ratio of trash results in significant N immobilization due to increased microbiological activity caused by energy input into the soil, leading to slow rates of N release in the short term (Meier et al, 2006). N recovery by sugarcane from crop residues was assessed using 15 N tracer techniques and was found to vary from 3 to 15 % (Basanta et al, 2003;Fortes et al, 2013;Gava et al, 2003;Ng Kee Kwong et al, 1987;Vitti et al, 2010;Vitti et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortes et al (2013) obtained trash-15 N recovery accumulated in a 3-yr period varying from 17 % to 31 %, whereas Basanta et al (2003) found 6 % after two seasons. Since most of the trash-derived N stays in the soil N pool (Meier et al, 2006;Fortes et al, 2013), the differences observed can be explained, at least in part, by variations on weather conditions favoring plant growth and uptake of trash-N mineralized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%