The Ba‘athist blackout? Selective goods provision and political violence in the Syrian civil war

Abstract

Many authoritarian regimes selectively provide critical segments of the population with privileged access to goods and services, expecting political support in return. This article is interested in the effects of this regime strategy: Is violent opposition less likely to occur in subnational regions bound to the ruling elite through such patron-client networks? For its empirical analysis, the article makes use of crowdsourcing data on the number and geospatial distribution of fatalities in the Syrian civil war from March 2011 to November 2012. In terms of selective goods provision, the focus is on the electricity sector. Satellite images of the earth at night are used to proxy spatial variations in the public distribution of electricity in times of power shortages. These data are complemented with information from the last Syrian population census of 2004. Estimations from fixed effect logit models lend support to the hypothesis that the risk of violence has been lower in subdistricts that have been favored by the ruling regime in terms of preferential access to material goods. This hypothesis is further corroborated with qualitative evidence from Syrian localities.

Africa’s lockdown dilemma: High poverty and low trust

“…Lockdowns in contexts of high poverty without adequate safety nets are likely to compound the collective action problems associated with the containment of COVID-19 among those that face a trade-off between exposure to the virus and securing their livelihoods. Similar to other fragile contexts (Taydas and Peksen 2012;De Juan and Bank 2015;Justino and Martorano 2018), welfare policies may support livelihoods and reduce the potential for unrest in communities where lockdown readiness is low. This is all the more important since poorer populations across SSA generally exhibit low trust towards their governments.…”

On-Side fighting in civil war: The logic of mortal alignment in Syria

“… 76. Della Porta (2013). Leenders and Heydemann (2012) and De Juan and Bank (2015) cover mechanisms behind the initiation of the conflict at the local level and patterns therein. …”

A Phenomenological Study on the Experience of Syrian Asylum‐Seekers and Refugees in the United States

“…But according to the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Darbouche, El‐Katiri, & Fattouh, ), an independent think tank at the University of Oxford, the project “remains doubtful” because “it is not clear how [it would] be financed given that both Iran and Syria are subject to strict financial sanctions” (p. 17). The sudden and unexpected implementation of government sanctions, provoked by rising geopolitical instability in the region, are reasons for the conflict accepted by mainstream scholars (De Juan & Bank, ; Jenkins, ).…”