2021
DOI: 10.1017/iop.2021.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The baby and the bathwater: On the need for substantive–methodological synergy in organizational research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, their global levels of work engagement would certainly offer these individuals the psychological nutrients they need to be highly functional at work (Huyghebaert-Zouaghi, Caesens, et al, 2022), although a negative imbalance between these work engagement components may still make it harder for them to truly experience a complete lack of negative manifestations of burnout. These findings thus capitalize on the growing person-centered research stream in organizational studies (Hofmans et al, 2021) to provide a more nuanced perspective on the motivational premise of burnout.…”
Section: Associations Between Burnout and Work Engagement Profile Mem...mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, their global levels of work engagement would certainly offer these individuals the psychological nutrients they need to be highly functional at work (Huyghebaert-Zouaghi, Caesens, et al, 2022), although a negative imbalance between these work engagement components may still make it harder for them to truly experience a complete lack of negative manifestations of burnout. These findings thus capitalize on the growing person-centered research stream in organizational studies (Hofmans et al, 2021) to provide a more nuanced perspective on the motivational premise of burnout.…”
Section: Associations Between Burnout and Work Engagement Profile Mem...mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…By focusing on subpopulations characterized by distinct configurations, or profiles, on a set of variables, person‐centered analyses thus seem naturally suited to study the joint effects of such complex variable combinations (Morin et al, 2018). As an added benefit, the person‐centered approach tends to be better aligned with managers' natural tendency to think in terms of categories rather than complex variable relations (Hofmans et al, 2021). Thus, rather than having to decode complex patterns of interrelations and interactions between variables, person‐centered results allow managers to easily identify types of employees and actionable levers of intervention to increase the likelihood of more desirable work engagement and burnout profiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, although job engagement is generally considered to be a dynamic construct that fluctuates over time (Sonnentag et al, 2021), only a handful of studies have adopted a methodological approach that accounts for this dynamic perspective (Hofmans et al, 2021). As a second contribution, the present study longitudinally addresses this limitation through latent curve modelling (LCM; Bollen & Curran, 2006) to achieve a better understanding of how job engagement trajectories evolve over a 1‐year period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job engagement, like many other psychological constructs (Hofmans et al, 2021; Navarro et al, 2020), has never been conceptualized as a static phenomenon, but rather as a dynamic construct which fluctuates over time and shares time‐structured associations with other constructs (e.g., Byrne et al, 2016; Crawford et al, 2010; Sonnentag et al, 2021). Unfortunately, the bulk of research on job engagement has relied on cross‐sectional designs or on limited longitudinal designs (including only two measurement points; Gillet et al, 2020; Rich et al, 2010), making it impossible to capture the dynamic nature of job engagement trajectories (Fletcher et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at the co‐development of GSE and OBSE is informative with respect to several issues, and answer to the call for more substantive–methodological synergy in organizational research (see Hofmans et al, 2021). For example, it allows to track the developmental trajectory of bot construct separately and then link the development of both forms of self‐esteem to relevant organizational outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%