1957
DOI: 10.1021/ja01560a009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Behavior of the Glass Electrode in Hydrogen Peroxide Solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this we calculate 𝑘 𝑃 = 0.5. A similar estimate from the data in 65 yields 𝑘 𝑃 = 0.2. We find, in any case, that the value of this equilibrium constant makes no difference to our conclusions, and only affects áșŒ at low [NaOH].…”
Section: Appendix Ii: Ionic Diffusiophoresis Speed Calculationssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…From this we calculate 𝑘 𝑃 = 0.5. A similar estimate from the data in 65 yields 𝑘 𝑃 = 0.2. We find, in any case, that the value of this equilibrium constant makes no difference to our conclusions, and only affects áșŒ at low [NaOH].…”
Section: Appendix Ii: Ionic Diffusiophoresis Speed Calculationssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…It has long been known that the pH meter readings in aqueous solutions of hydrogen peroxide are lower than the “real pH” (in water) and the difference, revealed by the glass−calomel electrode system as a shift in the E 0 value, increases with the increasing concentration of hydrogen peroxide. This behavior has been related 56 to the difference in free energy of solvation of the proton in water and in nearly anhydrous hydrogen peroxide (about 9 kcal/mol), which indicates that the proton is more firmly bound to water.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prewave at 1.14 V for the voltammetric reduction of S8 probably is due to the reduction of a protonated form of the S8 2" anion HSg-+ 2e~^H Sg3-ÂŁpC = -1.14 V (6) that results from proton abstraction from the solvent. The small oxidation wave at -0.75 V (Figure 1) appears to be due to the reverse of reaction 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%