2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The behaviour of Cu and Zn isotopes during soil development: Controls on the dissolved load of rivers

Abstract: Highlights • Light Cu, and unfractionated Zn, isotopes retained in oxic soils. • Development of anaerobic conditions can lead to loss of this signature. • Mineral aerosol addition and biological cycling overprint weathering processes. • Oxic soils contain Cu-Zn isotopes complementary to riverine dissolved pool.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
4
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to Zn, Cu in the riverine dissolved pool is isotopically heavy relative to rocks (Vance et al, 2008); this behaviour is similar to observations for Mo (Archer and Vance, 2008;Neubert et al, 2011), Li (Huh et al, 1998), Ni (Cameron and Vance, 2014), and Cr isotopes (Frei et al, 2014). Accordingly, there are two proposed explanations for the heavy Cu isotope composition in rivers: (1) An equilibrium isotope fractionation in rivers (Vance et al, 2008) and/or in soils (Vance et al, 2016) between an isotopically heavy, organic ligand bound, dissolved pool and an isotopically light pool sorbed to particulates; (2) Redox-driven release of isotopically heavy Cu during oxidative weathering of sulphides in black shales or supergene systems (Mathur et al, 2005;Mathur et al, 2012;Mathur and Fantle, 2015;Lv et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to Zn, Cu in the riverine dissolved pool is isotopically heavy relative to rocks (Vance et al, 2008); this behaviour is similar to observations for Mo (Archer and Vance, 2008;Neubert et al, 2011), Li (Huh et al, 1998), Ni (Cameron and Vance, 2014), and Cr isotopes (Frei et al, 2014). Accordingly, there are two proposed explanations for the heavy Cu isotope composition in rivers: (1) An equilibrium isotope fractionation in rivers (Vance et al, 2008) and/or in soils (Vance et al, 2016) between an isotopically heavy, organic ligand bound, dissolved pool and an isotopically light pool sorbed to particulates; (2) Redox-driven release of isotopically heavy Cu during oxidative weathering of sulphides in black shales or supergene systems (Mathur et al, 2005;Mathur et al, 2012;Mathur and Fantle, 2015;Lv et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Thus, mass balance constraints dictate that organically complexed Cu in solution will closely reflect the isotopic composition of the Cu that is mobilized during weathering, while the free Cu species will be fractionated by as much as -1.1‰. Consequently, in a scenario in which Zn and Cu are organically complexed in pore waters, secondary mineral phases may simply scavenge the isotopically light uncomplexed (or weakly-complexed) pool of Zn and Cu (as proposed by Vance et al, 2016).…”
Section: Isotope Fractionation In the Aqueous Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lack of a relationship of the δ 65 Cu values of dissolved Cu with the redox potential might be explained by the fact that the Cu isotope ratio of dissolved Cu in soils and rivers is more strongly controlled by complexation with strong dissolved ligands (Vance et al, 2008;Vance et al, 2016) than by redox changes. The responsible ligands were identified by cathode-stripping voltammetry and are subdivided in the ligand classes L1 and L2 (Muller et al, 2001).…”
Section: Cu In Soil Watermentioning
confidence: 89%