2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-016-0022-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Berlin Principles on Ranking Higher Education Institutions: limitations, legitimacy, and value conflict

Abstract: University rankings have been widely criticized and examined in terms of the environment they create for universities. In this paper, I reverse the question by examining how ranking organizations have responded to criticisms. I contrast ranking values and evaluation with those practiced by academic communities. I argue that the business of ranking higher education institutions is not one that lends itself to isomorphism with scholarly values and evaluation and that this dissonance creates reputational risk for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
27
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, academic values are considered as a kind of standard that allows you to maintain society at the level of civilization that it needs and is inherent in, increasing the relevance of higher education, on the one hand, and managing the ratings of educational organizations, on the other hand [10]. In the context of the modern understanding of the human phenomenon in the philosophy of education, its place and role in the education system, the analysis of humanistic foundations and ideological bases of modern education, this fact takes on particular urgency [11].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, academic values are considered as a kind of standard that allows you to maintain society at the level of civilization that it needs and is inherent in, increasing the relevance of higher education, on the one hand, and managing the ratings of educational organizations, on the other hand [10]. In the context of the modern understanding of the human phenomenon in the philosophy of education, its place and role in the education system, the analysis of humanistic foundations and ideological bases of modern education, this fact takes on particular urgency [11].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the existing ranking systems are criticized for several methodological shortcomings (Amsler & Bolsmann, 2012;Barron, 2017;Bougnol & Dulà, 2015;Çakır, Acartürk, Alaşehir, & Çilingir, 2015;Lynch, 2015). Among the main weaknesses mentioned, many say rankings are not robust enough, especially as far as validity of indicators, methodological soundness, transparency of sources of information and algorithms, reliability, and so on (Billaut, Bouyssou, & Vincke, 2009;Bonaccorsi & Cicero, 2016;Kroth & Daniel, 2008;Turner, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universities compete with each other not only at the national but also international levels. This competition at the international level is measured in global university rankings, such as Times Higher Education World University Rankings, Academic Ranking of World Universities, and Quacquarelli Symonds World University Rankings (Barron, ; Lo, ; Rhoads, Li, & Ilano, ). A high position in these rankings brings more prestige, fame, and reputation to the university (Lo, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%