1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01289426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The beta-decay energies of103In and104In

Abstract: The/3+ spectra of neutron-deficient nuclei with mass numbers 103 and 104 have been measured, using a semiconductor beta spectrometer. The nuclei were produced by on-line mass separation of reaction products formed by bombarding an enriched Mo target with Ne ions. Values for Q~c have been deduced. The decay energies are in agreement with systematics. The decay of 1~ shows remarkably strong feeding to levels above 5 MeV. In addition, Q~c values for 1~ l~ l~ and l~ have been determined.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To attain this high accuracy, a properly designed correction procedure for effects like back-scattering, bremsstrahlung escape and summation of annihilation quanta is vital [-7, 8]. The correctness of our mass determinations has recently been confirmed by direct mass measurements with an isotope separator [9]: the measured mass differences between ~~ 1~ and ~~ match the values deduced from our QEc measurements [2,6] and by using our precise Q~c values for x~ and a~ a new Qzc value for l~ is obtained (7.92_+0.14 MeV) [9], which is in agreement with our value (7.80_+ 0.25 MeV) [2].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To attain this high accuracy, a properly designed correction procedure for effects like back-scattering, bremsstrahlung escape and summation of annihilation quanta is vital [-7, 8]. The correctness of our mass determinations has recently been confirmed by direct mass measurements with an isotope separator [9]: the measured mass differences between ~~ 1~ and ~~ match the values deduced from our QEc measurements [2,6] and by using our precise Q~c values for x~ and a~ a new Qzc value for l~ is obtained (7.92_+0.14 MeV) [9], which is in agreement with our value (7.80_+ 0.25 MeV) [2].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The results of the fit are given in Table 1. The fit has as input parameters: -the QEc value: 7.89 MeV; a weighted average of the two experimental results [2,9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations