2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The biological basis of treating jaw discrepancies: An interplay of mechanical forces and skeletal configuration

Abstract: Jaw discrepancies and malrelations affect a large proportion of the general population and their treatment is of utmost significance for individuals' health and quality of life. The aim of their therapy is the modification of aberrant jaw development mainly by targeting the growth potential of the mandibular condyle through its cartilage, and the architectural shape of alveolar bone through a suture type of structure, the periodontal ligament. This targeted treatment is achieved via external mechanical force a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Low intensity vibration (LIV) can increase bone density and can be used in the treatment of osteoporosis and fracture [ 116–117 ]. Moreover, mechanical loading is widely used to treat craniofacial deformities such as jaw discrepancies and cranial suture [ 118 ]. The above findings imply that modulating the expression levels of miRNAs could enhance the efficacy of mechanical force in the treatment of bone diseases…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low intensity vibration (LIV) can increase bone density and can be used in the treatment of osteoporosis and fracture [ 116–117 ]. Moreover, mechanical loading is widely used to treat craniofacial deformities such as jaw discrepancies and cranial suture [ 118 ]. The above findings imply that modulating the expression levels of miRNAs could enhance the efficacy of mechanical force in the treatment of bone diseases…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…También se realizaron estudios para medir la discrepancia esqueletal con el ángulo beta 33 , en los que se le comparó con los valores para caucásicos y se correlacionaron con ANB y Wits. Se concluyó que el ángulo beta es altamente confiable para evaluar las discrepancias sagitales de maxilar y mandíbula, ya que la media y desviación estándar para cada clase esqueletal son estadísticamente diferentes entre ellas.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified