2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The BIOSAFEPAPER project for in vitro toxicity assessments: Preparation, detailed chemical characterisation and testing of extracts from paper and board samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, some interdisciplinary studies have tried to screen paper and board FCMs by using both chemical analysis and in vitro tests (Vinggaard et al 2000;Binderup et al 2002;Lopez-Espinosa et al 2007;Bradley et al 2008;Koster et al 2014). This process is used as a fast screening, excluding irrelevant samples and enabling further investigations on only toxicologically relevant samples.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, some interdisciplinary studies have tried to screen paper and board FCMs by using both chemical analysis and in vitro tests (Vinggaard et al 2000;Binderup et al 2002;Lopez-Espinosa et al 2007;Bradley et al 2008;Koster et al 2014). This process is used as a fast screening, excluding irrelevant samples and enabling further investigations on only toxicologically relevant samples.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach leads to high demands on the extraction method, as it should be both comprehensive and compatible with in vitro assays. Even after an initial screening phase, the analysis of toxicologically relevant extracts by chromatographic methods will still give complex results, described as a forest-of-peaks analysis (Bradley et al 2008Koster et al 2014). By fractioning the raw extracts into a number of fractions, and subsequently testing these in in vitro assays, the number of substances relevant for identification will be further reduced.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Derivatisation of non-volatile substances to make these substances amenable (more volatile) to analysis by GC-MS (for example Koek et al (2006) and Bradley et al (2008));…”
Section: Complex Mixture Safety Assessment Strategy (Comsas )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only recently whole packaging migrates from different FCMs have been studied for their overall toxicity [15,16,47,[52][53][54]. It is noteworthy that in all studies effects of the whole leacheate were observed that could not be explained only by the known toxicity of identified or putative mixture components.…”
Section: New Toxicological Paradigms Of Relevance For Fcm Effect Assementioning
confidence: 99%