Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3430524.3440651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bodies of TEI – Investigating Norms and Assumptions in the Design of Embodied Interaction

Abstract: In the few decades since the first mainframe computers, computing technologies have grown smaller, and more pervasive, moving onto and even inside human bodies. Even as those bodies have received increased attention by scholars, designers, and technologists, the bodily expectations and understandings articulated by these technological artefacts have not been a focus of inquiry in the field. I conducted a feminist content analysis on select papers in the proceeding of the ACM International Conference on Tangibl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent scholarship in HCI, informed by Disability Studies and critical feminist scholarship, has highlighted the ways in which the conventional approaches to design for embodied interaction are highly problematic ( Giaccardi and Karana, 2015 ; Shildrick, 2013 ). As Katta Spiel notes in ( Spiel, 2021 ), “bodies and how we design for them are products of social norms,” and these norms contain dangerous adverse consequences for bodies and people that do not fit readily inside these normative categories. Much of HRI and literature on embodied interaction equate being human with white, male, non-disabled bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent scholarship in HCI, informed by Disability Studies and critical feminist scholarship, has highlighted the ways in which the conventional approaches to design for embodied interaction are highly problematic ( Giaccardi and Karana, 2015 ; Shildrick, 2013 ). As Katta Spiel notes in ( Spiel, 2021 ), “bodies and how we design for them are products of social norms,” and these norms contain dangerous adverse consequences for bodies and people that do not fit readily inside these normative categories. Much of HRI and literature on embodied interaction equate being human with white, male, non-disabled bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frey et al [27] developed a pendant where the wearer aligns their breath with the fading LEDs; a similar strategy to our use of ATB, yet we delve deeper into personal preferences regarding the public visibility of emotional data. HCI researchers are at the beginnings of conversations around the opposition to standardization and the support of diversification [40,101], towards bespoke and personalised technology designs.…”
Section: Wearable Technology and Jewelrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one, many workshop participants did not identify with it and would have preferred the ability to customize it, to better match their own bodies, or the bodies of the target group they were designing for. This also had practical design consequences, as it masked difficulties which arise when designing a fixed layout for multiple bodies (see also [48]). One might also speculate if the chest had been used as frequently for placing tactons in workshop one, if the mannequin had larger breasts.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%