The Body in Sociology: Tensions inside and outside Sociological Thought

Abstract

The human body has in recent years become a 'hot' topic in sociology, not just in empirical research but also in sociological theorizing. In the latter context, the body has been variously a resource for broadening the parameters of traditional sociological thought deriving from the nineteenth century, and for overturning that paradigm and fundamentally reorienting the assumptions and concepts of sociological thinking. Attempts to abandon the old paradigm and foster a new one through the means of thinking about bodies are many and manifold, and in this paper we trace out the intricate history of moves towards a 'corporeal sociology'. We identify the dilemmas that have attended these developments, especially as concerns the ways in which new modes of thinking sociologically have tended to founder over the classical sociological dichotomy between social structure and social action. Through tracing out the various moves and counter-moves within this field, we identify a central contradiction that affects all contemporary sociological practice, not just that dealing with the body: an oscillation between judging the utility of conceptual tools in terms of criteria derived from the discipline of Cultural Studies, and evaluating the arguments created by those tools on the basis of the incompatible criteria of classical sociology. The paper challenges sociologists to choose one set of criteria or the other, for sociological practice cannot be based on both such antagonistic paradigms.

Knowing as practice: Self-care in the case of chronic multi-morbidities

“…These are: (i) accounts that privilege social structure, the degree to which body-as-object is inscribed by political and social discourses from the outside: 'what is done to the body'; and (ii) those that focus on agency: the experience of the body-subject within her social world, or 'what the body does' (Crossley, 1995(Crossley, , 1996Howson and Inglis, 2001). Although this distinction (again, broadly) adheres to the emic/etic divide, discrete perspectives may be more or less dualistic in their approach to the body, in a way that does not divide neatly between the two categories.…”

‘Estrogen-Filled Worlds’: Fathers as Primary Caregivers and Embodiment

“…It is now well established that the ‘human body has in recent years become a “hot” topic in sociology’ (Howson and Inglis, 2001). Yet while there is a ‘whole industry of research and scholarship on the body’ (Nettleton and Watson, 1998: 2; see also Shilling, 2003), this phenomenal growth has not found its way into research on fathering.…”

Išgyvenamas negalios apimtas kūnas

“…Informantai Mindaugas ir Ilma pripažįsta išgyvenantys šį kūno sunkumą ir trukdymą aktyviam Aš realizuoti savo veiksmus, intencijas: Remiantis M. Merleau-Ponty, pasaulis, kuriame kūnas-subjektas veikia, iš esmės yra tarpkūniškas, kitaip tariant, žmones tarpusavyje sieja įgimtas kūniškas ryšys. Ir savo žmogišką prigimtį subjektas gali suvokti žvelgdamas į kitų kūnus (Howson and Inglis 2001; 304). Be to, subjekto kūnui būdingas sugebėjimas ne tik suvokti save kaip duotą sau pačiam, bet ir suvokti, kaip jį suvokia kitas (Jonkus 2008; 137).…”