2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0367-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Boundary — Scan Handbook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, some circuit nodes connecting two or more ball grid array pins may never have surface to test, so it makes boundary scan the only way of quality testing (Ehrenberg, 2007). In current trends, industries are using IEEE 1149.1 boundary scan standard to test the heavily loaded PCB as this method is cost effective and have no need of physical probing (Parker, 1992;Lofstrom, 1996;Hur and Lim, 1994;Lee et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Furthermore, some circuit nodes connecting two or more ball grid array pins may never have surface to test, so it makes boundary scan the only way of quality testing (Ehrenberg, 2007). In current trends, industries are using IEEE 1149.1 boundary scan standard to test the heavily loaded PCB as this method is cost effective and have no need of physical probing (Parker, 1992;Lofstrom, 1996;Hur and Lim, 1994;Lee et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This online detection of faults might be obtained through the use of an enlarged boundary scan scheme [14] and test information with extensive coverage to allow the identification of the fault and the reorganization of the ANN without the damaged elements.…”
Section: Fault Tolerance Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stack maker might execute post-bond tests on partial and/or complete, not- yet-packaged and/or packaged die stacks; these tests might cover intra-die circuitry (possibly as re-test), as well as the inter-die TSV-based connections [11]. It is assumed that it is a requirement from the stack user that the overall stack product is IEEE 1149.1 [15,16] compliant on its pins, in order to facilitate board-level interconnect testing.…”
Section: Assumptions and Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1500 [13,14] and IEEE Std. 1149.1 [15,16]. Section 4 details various implementation aspects of the die-level wrapper, and in Section 5 we present experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%