2016
DOI: 10.1167/16.6.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The brain frequency tuning function for facial emotion discrimination: An ssVEP study

Abstract: Steady-state visual evoked potentials have only been applied recently to the study of face perception. We used this method to study the spatial and temporal dynamics of expression perception in the human brain and test the prediction that, as in the case of identity perception, the optimal frequency for facial expression would also be in the range of 5-6 Hz. We presented facial expressions at different flickering frequencies (2-8 Hz) to human observers while recording their brain electrical activity. Our modif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarities in the processing of face trustworthiness and emotional expressions have previously been noted in studies using ERPs ( Dzhelyova et al, 2012 ; Marzi et al, 2014 ; Rudoy & Paller, 2009 ; Yang et al, 2011 ) and in a meta-analysis of fMRI studies ( Mende-Siedlecki et al, 2013 ). Although several studies have used FPVS to investigate responses to emotional facial expressions ( Dzhelyova, Jacques, & Rossion, 2017 ; Gerlicher, Loon, Scholte, Lamme, & van der Leij, 2014 ; Zhu, Alonso-Prieto, Handy, & Barton, 2016 ), none of them have directly compared angry versus happy expressions. However, one of these studies did find spatially distinct responses to oddball faces with disgust, fear, and happy expressions, with more similar responses for the disgust and fear expressions ( Dzhelyova et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarities in the processing of face trustworthiness and emotional expressions have previously been noted in studies using ERPs ( Dzhelyova et al, 2012 ; Marzi et al, 2014 ; Rudoy & Paller, 2009 ; Yang et al, 2011 ) and in a meta-analysis of fMRI studies ( Mende-Siedlecki et al, 2013 ). Although several studies have used FPVS to investigate responses to emotional facial expressions ( Dzhelyova, Jacques, & Rossion, 2017 ; Gerlicher, Loon, Scholte, Lamme, & van der Leij, 2014 ; Zhu, Alonso-Prieto, Handy, & Barton, 2016 ), none of them have directly compared angry versus happy expressions. However, one of these studies did find spatially distinct responses to oddball faces with disgust, fear, and happy expressions, with more similar responses for the disgust and fear expressions ( Dzhelyova et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major application of the SS-EP technique has focused on high-level vision, by presenting participants with a high-frequency periodic stream of visual stimuli in which high-level content is periodically modulated at a lower frequency. For example, the neural underpinnings of face identification can be isolated by modulating high-level features such as facial identity or facial expression ( Rossion and Boremanse, 2011 ; Zhu et al, 2016 ). The fast-periodic oddball paradigm (described in section 3.1 ) can be used to directly tag the contrasting categorical response between two sets of stimuli, using a single stimulation stream.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cortical spatial brain network connection differences and cortical source response differences are of great significance to better understand the processing of different emotions and improve the accuracy of emotion recognition based on EEG signals. In this work, with the help of stable state visual evoked potential's (SSVEP) good time resolution (time-locked and phaselocked characteristics) and high signal-to-noise ratio, we utilized the source location method to reconstruct the cerebral cortex signal [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%