2007
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull

Abstract: The influence of tethering silicon microelectrode arrays on the cortical brain tissue reaction was compared with that of untethered implants placed in the same location by identical means using immunoflourescent methods and cell type specific markers over indwelling periods of 1-4 weeks. Compared with untethered, freely floating implants, tethered microelectrodes elicited significantly greater reactivity to antibodies against ED1 and GFAP over time. Regardless of implantation method or indwelling time, retriev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
294
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(310 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
14
294
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Often such implantable medical devices attach to the outside or inside of the skull containing electronic signal processing elements connected to one or more electrodes that penetrates the skull to record neural activities in brain, or to stimulate neurons of the brain in a safe and predictable manner [15][16][17]. Recording of neuronal activities of the brain can be in form of LFP as used in ECoG, or neuronal action potentials as used in neuronal microelectrode or microwire [15].…”
Section: Invasive Bci Monitoring Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Often such implantable medical devices attach to the outside or inside of the skull containing electronic signal processing elements connected to one or more electrodes that penetrates the skull to record neural activities in brain, or to stimulate neurons of the brain in a safe and predictable manner [15][16][17]. Recording of neuronal activities of the brain can be in form of LFP as used in ECoG, or neuronal action potentials as used in neuronal microelectrode or microwire [15].…”
Section: Invasive Bci Monitoring Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasive electrode tethered to the skull appears to elicit greater inflammatory reaction than free-floating invasive electrode on the brain. This could be as a result of increased micro-motion of invasive electrode on the brain in tethered invasive electrodes as the whole brain moves and float in the cerebrospinal fluid [16].…”
Section: Neuronal Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] Additionally, long-term breach of the highly-selective blood-brain barrier (BBB) eventually leads to secretion of neurotoxins that kill neurons proximal to the electrode, thereby diminishing the signal of interest permanently. [12] Contributing factors believed to adversely affect the quality of the electrode-tissue interface in a chronic time window include electrode size, [13,14] density of electrode material, [15] skull tethering mechanisms and associated micromotion of the implant, [16] and mechanical compliance of the electrode itself. [17,18] Considering the aforementioned characteristics, the ideal implantable electrode will be small, soft, mechanically-strong, and have a density similar to neural tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Microelectrode implants often fail either due to the chronic tissue response caused by the tethering forces of the wires or their breakage. 4,5 A wireless neural stimulator can solve the problems associated with wire interconnects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%