2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedp.2018.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Brazilian Portuguese version of the Pediatric Trigger Toolkit is applicable to measure the occurrence of adverse drug events in Brazilian pediatric inpatients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the period under study, only 4% of the notifications were via SNs. However, we must take into account that, even so, SNs are more assertive in identifying ADRs than AS, represent the classic method of identifying these problems and are extremely relevant for effective patient safety 4,7,11,12,22,26,30,35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…During the period under study, only 4% of the notifications were via SNs. However, we must take into account that, even so, SNs are more assertive in identifying ADRs than AS, represent the classic method of identifying these problems and are extremely relevant for effective patient safety 4,7,11,12,22,26,30,35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this period, 2 pharmacovigilance triggers stood out, RM1 (antiallergy) and RM2 (anticoagulant antidotes), with PVVs of 9% and 3%, respectively. A study with ADR triggers in pediatric patients 11 showed higher predictability of antiallergics (dexchlorpheniramine, loratadine and promethazine) with a 38% PPV index. The use of anticoagulant antidotes (protamine and Vitamin K) as triggers was also reported as an important ADR trigger with a relative yield of The very low presence of other professionals in the SNs is worrying, especially the lack of notifications by professionals closely linked to the medications and trained to identify potential ADRs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations