2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20678-3_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bridge Connecting Theory to Practice - A Case Study of Universal Design Process

Abstract: Abstract. In a typical design process, the decision making process by which desirable and predictive outcomes are achieved is clearly defined by problem definition, goals and objectives setting, design criteria development, design solution generation and evaluation of the solutions. In contrast, the current literature on Universal Design typically jumps from Universal Design as an ideal and set of principles to Universal Design as an artifact. Without interpreting Universal Design principles into specific desi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Universal design (UD) and inclusive design (ID) have been identified as potential means of addressing accessibility challenges during design, due to their focal point of considering all users and the "full range of human diversity" (Liu et al, 2015) into the design process, with the intent of providing access to as many citizens as possible (Dosis, 2014). Universal Design (UD) advocates for the accessibility and usability of a system for users, irrespective of their age, and different abilities (Awale & Murano, 2020).…”
Section: Universal and Inclusive Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Universal design (UD) and inclusive design (ID) have been identified as potential means of addressing accessibility challenges during design, due to their focal point of considering all users and the "full range of human diversity" (Liu et al, 2015) into the design process, with the intent of providing access to as many citizens as possible (Dosis, 2014). Universal Design (UD) advocates for the accessibility and usability of a system for users, irrespective of their age, and different abilities (Awale & Murano, 2020).…”
Section: Universal and Inclusive Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hospitality enables designers and developers to become people‐oriented, requiring them to “consider what the needs and desired outcomes of the users are and mirror those in the design” (Dosis, 2014, p. 19). Sociability principles ensure that designers and developers provide an optimal user experience for all individuals, irrespective of their full range of human diversity (Dosis, 2014; Liu et al, 2015). Inclusive design seeks to address digital accessibility by recognizing both diversity and uniqueness; employing inclusive design process and tools; and striving for broader beneficial impacts (Stofer et al, 2023).…”
Section: Related Work On E‐government Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many studies that implement F-DEMATEL for different decision problems (Büyüközkan and Çifçi, 2012;Lin, 2013;Yeh and Huang, 2014;Patil and Kant, 2014;Liu et al, 2015;Abdullah and Zulkifli, 2015;Luthra et al, 2016;Sangaiah et al, 2017). Additionally, Chang and Cheng (2010) proposed an intuitionistic fuzzy DEMATEL (IF-DEMATEL) to improve the performance of failure modes and effects analysis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Panasonic developed six UD guidelines covering operations, space, usage, and maintenance of its products [5]. Although UD is often a crucial part of product evaluation before application, it is mostly used for post hoc evaluation at the end of product development, which results in UDs often being reflected in additional features [6,7]. The effects are notable when interventions occur in the early stages of product development [8], such as during product-demand strategy and product-specification planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%