2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1097(03)00384-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The budding index of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion strains identifies genes important for cell cycle progression

Abstract: Budding marks initiation of cell division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Consequently, cell cycle progression can be monitored by the fraction of budded cells (budding index) in a proliferating cell population. We determined the budding index of a large collection of deletion strains, to systematically identify genes involved in cell cycle progression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aberrant cell morphology seen is consistent with protracted checkpoint activation or uncoupling of the morphology checkpoint from cell cycle delay caused by DNA damage during DNA replication or defects in DNA replication (56,64,73,74). Mutations affecting HR, including sister chromatid HR and processing of HR intermediates (rad52⌬, mre11⌬, rad50⌬, xrs2⌬, esc2⌬, and mph1⌬) caused aberrant morphology when combined with the rnh203⌬ mutation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aberrant cell morphology seen is consistent with protracted checkpoint activation or uncoupling of the morphology checkpoint from cell cycle delay caused by DNA damage during DNA replication or defects in DNA replication (56,64,73,74). Mutations affecting HR, including sister chromatid HR and processing of HR intermediates (rad52⌬, mre11⌬, rad50⌬, xrs2⌬, esc2⌬, and mph1⌬) caused aberrant morphology when combined with the rnh203⌬ mutation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The cell cycle distribution was followed using the budding index, which uses the bud morphology of normal log-phase cells to identify cells in G 1 phase (no bud), S phase (small bud), and G 2 /M phase (large bud). We also counted cells with aberrant morphology, which typically consist of cells with grossly elongated or multiple buds and have been observed in strains with alterations in the timing of cell cycle transitions, DNA replication defects, and uncoupling of replication defects from checkpoint responses (56,64,73,74). We observed decreased proportions of G 1 -and S-phase cells, along with an increased fraction of cells with aberrant morphologies in strains where the rnh203⌬ mutation was combined with the asf1⌬, esc2⌬, mgs1⌬, mph1⌬, mre11⌬, rad50⌬, rad52⌬, or xrs2⌬ mutation ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3C and D; Table 1). TOS9, which has more recently been referred to as EAP2 in C. albicans (27), has homologs in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (22) and S. cerevisiae (50,51). These homologs, referred to in both strains as TOS9, have been implicated in mating, gluconate transport, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) regulation, budding, and cell adhesion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GID8 and DCR2 overexpression may alter cell cycle progression either by directly shortening the G 1 phase, which leads to a high budding index due to a compensatory expansion of subsequent cell cycle phases, or by simply delaying mitotic progression (34). A mitotic delay can lead to a shorter G 1 phase in the next cell cycle, presumably because it allows the cells to grow and reach the critical size for initiation in the next division faster.…”
Section: Vol 3 2004mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of budded cells (budding index) was evaluated as described previously (34). DNA content was evaluated by flow cytometry as described previously (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%