2016
DOI: 10.1177/0170840615613375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Burden of History in the Family Business Organization

Abstract: In this paper we focus on the study of history through the use of narratives, within the context of the prevalent form of organization worldwide: the family business. Specifically we consider the dilemma of the impossible gift of succession using Nietzsche's discussion of the burden of history and paralleling the story of a family business succession with that of Shakespeare's King Lear. This way, we seek to make a contribution to organizational studies by answering recent calls to engage more with history in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
(187 reference statements)
0
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the publication of Rowlinson et al (2010) there has been an increasing awareness of the social aspects of memory within management and organization studies. The scope and impact of OMS over the past decade can be comprehended by looking at the range of recent articles on memory, broadly conceived, in organization theory (Foroughi & Al-Amoudi, 2020; Ocasio et al, 2016), strategy (Foster, Coraiola, Suddaby, Kroezen, & Chandler, 2017; Sasaki, Kotlar, Ravasi, & Vaara, 2020), entrepreneurship (Cruz, 2014; Jaskiewicz, Combs, & Rau, 2015), corporate social responsibility (Coraiola & Derry, 2020; Mena, Rintamäki, Fleming, & Spicer, 2016) and family business (Hjorth & Dawson, 2016; Sasaki, Ravasi & Micelotta, 2019). Such research has moved away from a conceptualization of memory as an objective stock of knowledge.…”
Section: An Overview Of Organizational Memory Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the publication of Rowlinson et al (2010) there has been an increasing awareness of the social aspects of memory within management and organization studies. The scope and impact of OMS over the past decade can be comprehended by looking at the range of recent articles on memory, broadly conceived, in organization theory (Foroughi & Al-Amoudi, 2020; Ocasio et al, 2016), strategy (Foster, Coraiola, Suddaby, Kroezen, & Chandler, 2017; Sasaki, Kotlar, Ravasi, & Vaara, 2020), entrepreneurship (Cruz, 2014; Jaskiewicz, Combs, & Rau, 2015), corporate social responsibility (Coraiola & Derry, 2020; Mena, Rintamäki, Fleming, & Spicer, 2016) and family business (Hjorth & Dawson, 2016; Sasaki, Ravasi & Micelotta, 2019). Such research has moved away from a conceptualization of memory as an objective stock of knowledge.…”
Section: An Overview Of Organizational Memory Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collectively, we label the sum of this values work as 'spreading' insofar as this is helps the family business approach the maturity stage by leveraging family tradition and legacy to ensure cross-generational entrepreneurial behaviour (Jaskiewicz et al, 2015;Minola et al, 2016;Zellweger and Sieger, 2012). Compared to earlier findings (e.g., Hjorth and Dawson, 2016;Jaskiewicz et al, 2015), our analysis highlights the importance of materializing and embodying specifically selected family values to maintain meaningful link to the past, thereby encouraging continued entrepreneurial behaviour in a mature family firm.…”
Section: Theory Building: System-spanning Values Work As Driver Of Comentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Some studies have shown that only 30% of family companies survive into the second generation and only 15% into the third. Proper succession planning is essential for a successful transition (Gilding, Gregory, & Cosson, 2015;Hjorth & Dawson, 2016;Morris, Williams, & Nel, 1996).…”
Section: The Challenges Of a Family-run Businessmentioning
confidence: 99%