2022
DOI: 10.1093/tcbh/hwac001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bureaucratization of Death: The First World War, Families, and the State

Abstract: After the First World War the British state tried to show the families of the dead their thanks, and memorialize the dead, through the two-minute silence and the creation of the Tomb of the Unknown Warrior. However, before families of deceased servicepeople encountered the state through national commemorations they encountered it through the administrative paperwork of death. Other than brief mentions in wider works, the bureaucracy of death is remarkably absent from discussions of death, yet the paperwork ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, there is a need to document if guidelines of health specialists issued to all the large imperial armies were respected on the ground and to document what did the battlefields' ‘sanitizing’ or ‘clean up’ (wording of the time) actually entail for human remains. While state administrations and armies mobilised the respectful language of grief, commemoration and sometimes glorification when referring to the dead—even if sometimes their approach could be dispassionate and bureaucratic (Foster, 2022)—dealing with a large number of corpses on the ground responded to a different logic: that of disposal. Although the words body disposal or management were not in use at the time, they offer a valid heuristic framework for an investigation of what these societies did with the corpses.…”
Section: The Administration Of the Dead As A Programme Of Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, there is a need to document if guidelines of health specialists issued to all the large imperial armies were respected on the ground and to document what did the battlefields' ‘sanitizing’ or ‘clean up’ (wording of the time) actually entail for human remains. While state administrations and armies mobilised the respectful language of grief, commemoration and sometimes glorification when referring to the dead—even if sometimes their approach could be dispassionate and bureaucratic (Foster, 2022)—dealing with a large number of corpses on the ground responded to a different logic: that of disposal. Although the words body disposal or management were not in use at the time, they offer a valid heuristic framework for an investigation of what these societies did with the corpses.…”
Section: The Administration Of the Dead As A Programme Of Workmentioning
confidence: 99%