2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cadomian Orogeny and the opening of the Rheic Ocean: The diacrony of geotectonic processes constrained by LA-ICP-MS U–Pb zircon dating (Ossa-Morena and Saxo-Thuringian Zones, Iberian and Bohemian Massifs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
275
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 407 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
11
275
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the GQ correspond to sediments deposited on the Gondwanan PM after separation of avalonia. The evolutionary scheme for the sedimentary basins and tectonic settings proposed for the OSD metasediments described in the present work is in agreement with the tectonic scenario suggested for the evolution of the neoproterozoic to Ordovician volcano-sedimentary successions preserved in the Saxo-Thuringian in Germany, and the Ossa-Morena and Central Iberian Zones in Portugal and Spain (e.g., Pereira et al 2006;linnemann et al 2008). Moreover, it corroborates current hypotheses for the formation of the Rheic Ocean (e.g., arenas et al 2007, Sánchez-García et al 2008Martinez et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the GQ correspond to sediments deposited on the Gondwanan PM after separation of avalonia. The evolutionary scheme for the sedimentary basins and tectonic settings proposed for the OSD metasediments described in the present work is in agreement with the tectonic scenario suggested for the evolution of the neoproterozoic to Ordovician volcano-sedimentary successions preserved in the Saxo-Thuringian in Germany, and the Ossa-Morena and Central Iberian Zones in Portugal and Spain (e.g., Pereira et al 2006;linnemann et al 2008). Moreover, it corroborates current hypotheses for the formation of the Rheic Ocean (e.g., arenas et al 2007, Sánchez-García et al 2008Martinez et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In Europe, the internal part of the orogenic belt includes some rock complexes which contain Cadomian basement derived from an arc developed at the Gondwanan margin during latest neoproterozoic (e.g., Fernandez-Suarez et al 2003;linnemann et al 2008). This arc was later detached from the edge of Gondwana during late Cambrian-Early Ordovician times and drifted northward, resulting in the opening of the Rheic Ocean Murphy et al 2009;nance et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cryogenian to Ediacaran population (peaks at c. 625 and 580 Ma) corresponds with the Pan-African and Cadomian orogenies, which overlap temporally in northern Gondwana regions (Murphy and Nance, 1991;Nance and Murphy, 1994;Linnemann et al, 2008). The zircon ages that can be attributed to these orogenic events are almost ubiquitous in Ediacaran and Paleozoic metasedimentary successions of the Iberian Massif.…”
Section: Main Zircon Forming Events and Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The most pronounced age maximum spans the interval of 500-640 Ma with maximum data density between 540-600 Ma. The Neoproterozoic protolith ages of 540-580 Ma are typical of granitoids and orthogneisses of the Brunovistulian (van Breemen et al 1982;Scharbert and Batík 1985;Fritz et al 1996;Friedl et al 2000Friedl et al , 2004; see Leichmann and Höck 2008 for review) as well as Saxothuringian and Lugian domains (Hegner and Kröner 2000;Tichomirowa et al 2001;Linnemann et al 2008 and references therein) and they only rarely appear as protolith ages of Moldanubian orthogneisses (Schulmann et al 2005). Importantly, Cambrian ages of 500-520 Ma are absent in the Moravo-Silesian Domain (Brunia), but they are known as the most frequent protolith ages of the Moldanubian orthogneisses, as well as of some ortho gneisses in the Saxothuringian and Lugian domains (Vrána and Kröner 1995;Hegner and Kröner 2000;Tichomirowa et al 2001;Friedl et al 2004;Schulmann et al 2005).…”
Section: Geochronological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%