2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1680-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The calcium scare—what would Austin Bradford Hill have thought?

Abstract: Present evidence that calcium supplementation increases heart attacks is too weak to justify a change in prescribing habits.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An MI in a patient taking supplements for five to ten years would normally not be attributed to the long-term use of these bone-protecting pills, and therefore the association cannot be detected by SRSs. Our point is not whether or not calcium supplements really cause myocardial infarction [4], but even if this was the case, existing drug surveillance would probably miss detecting it by SRS. On the other hand, epidemiological studies not prospectively designed to detect specific ADRs (here, MIs as a function of calcium supplement intake) can always be criticized and their results judged to be inconclusive.…”
Section: Out Of Sight -Out Of Mind! Practical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…An MI in a patient taking supplements for five to ten years would normally not be attributed to the long-term use of these bone-protecting pills, and therefore the association cannot be detected by SRSs. Our point is not whether or not calcium supplements really cause myocardial infarction [4], but even if this was the case, existing drug surveillance would probably miss detecting it by SRS. On the other hand, epidemiological studies not prospectively designed to detect specific ADRs (here, MIs as a function of calcium supplement intake) can always be criticized and their results judged to be inconclusive.…”
Section: Out Of Sight -Out Of Mind! Practical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Due to the controversial results of the studies regarding the association between calcium supplementation and the risk of coronary heart disease [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] , further research is needed [80][81][82] .…”
Section: Other Preventive Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 This study raised a storm of controversy and was followed by a slew of studies, editorials and commentaries both corroborating with as well as negating the findings. [60][61][62][63][64][65] However, it has to be noted that though a recent meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials 61 demonstrated that the risk of incident myocardial infarction in those patients who were allocated to calcium did increase by 31%, the Vitamin D Vitamin D deficiency by leading to secondary hyperparathyroidism and increased bone turnover is presumed to be a major contributor to osteoporosis as it leads to secondary hyperparathyroidism and increased bone turnover. 68 Controversy in literature has recently erupted following the US Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations that the cut-point for serum vitamin D adequacy be 50 nmol/litre rather than the opinion of some experts that it should be 75 nmol/l.…”
Section: Secondary Osteoporosismentioning
confidence: 99%