1997
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620160804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The calux (chemical‐activated luciferase expression) assay adapted and validated for measuring TCDD equivalents in blood plasma

Abstract: Abstract-A method was developed to isolate lipophilic compounds efficiently from small aliquots of blood plasma and test these for total dioxin-like toxic potency using recombinant rat (H4IIE) and mouse (Hepa1c1c7) hepatoma cell lines, containing the firefly (Photinus pyralis) luciferase gene under trans-activational control of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). For this experiment, blood plasma was used originating from eider ducks (Somateria mollissima) that had been dosed with 3,3Ј,4,4Ј-tetrachlorobipheny… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies, in which dioxin congeners were determined separately by using gas chromatography with high-resolution mass spectrometry, and in which the TEQ value was calculated by multiplying concentrations of individual dioxin congeners by their respective toxic equivalent factors (TEFs), should be interpreted cautiously, because TEFs for individual congeners are theoretical values based on various toxicologic end points obtained in different studies (16). Moreover, TEQs are usually assumed to be additive and not synergistic or antagonistic (17). The CALUX assay used in the present study is mechanistically based and thus measures all compounds in the serum that act via binding to the AhR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies, in which dioxin congeners were determined separately by using gas chromatography with high-resolution mass spectrometry, and in which the TEQ value was calculated by multiplying concentrations of individual dioxin congeners by their respective toxic equivalent factors (TEFs), should be interpreted cautiously, because TEFs for individual congeners are theoretical values based on various toxicologic end points obtained in different studies (16). Moreover, TEQs are usually assumed to be additive and not synergistic or antagonistic (17). The CALUX assay used in the present study is mechanistically based and thus measures all compounds in the serum that act via binding to the AhR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed the extraction and cleanup procedures as described in detail elsewhere (16)(17)(18). Briefly, the method involved nhexane extraction of the sample and removal of acid-labile matrix components, fat, and nonstable PCAHs by passage through a silica column containing concentrated H 2 SO 4 (33%, w/v).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, deviations between the TEF values for individual congeners and their relative effective potency to induce a bioassay response, and contributions from AhR ligands for which no TEFs are available, could in principle lead to discrepancies between bioassay and GC/HRMS results. Nevertheless, these bioassays have been successfully used in several applications, including assessments of dioxin-like potency in sediments and pore water, blood plasma, sewage sludge, food control, and analyses of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [13][14][15][16][17]. Intra-and interlaboratory comparison studies have confirmed their usefulness in dioxin analysis of soils and sediments [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest induction of EROD activities and thus the Ah receptor binding affinities were by 2,3,7,8-TCDD, followed by B[a]P, TCDT, and b-NF, with EC 50 values of about 1.6, 480, 570, and 25,000 pg/mL, respectively. The detection limit in this assay system was 40 fg TCDD/well, which was comparable to the ChemicalActivated Luciferase Expression (CALUX) assay, with a detection limit of 32 fg/well (Murk et al, 1997). There was no EROD induction by p,p 0 -DDT, p,p 0 -DDE, and DMSO (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%