2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cancode interaction analysis system in the oncological setting: reliability and validity of video and audio tape coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inter-rater reliability was 0.50 for function and 0.59 for content, whereas intra-rater reliability was 0.86 for content and 0.80 for function (Dent et al, 2005). In this study, based on the 10% of transcripts checked, our coders obtained a high intra-rater reliability of 0.95 for the content category and an inter-rater reliability of 0.92.…”
Section: Cancode Interaction Analysismentioning
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Inter-rater reliability was 0.50 for function and 0.59 for content, whereas intra-rater reliability was 0.86 for content and 0.80 for function (Dent et al, 2005). In this study, based on the 10% of transcripts checked, our coders obtained a high intra-rater reliability of 0.95 for the content category and an inter-rater reliability of 0.92.…”
Section: Cancode Interaction Analysismentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The resultant data sheet is automatically converted into a spreadsheet in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for further analysis. The reliability and validity of the CANCODE system has been previously established.Inter-rater reliability was 0.50 for function and 0.59 for content, whereas intra-rater reliability was 0.86 for content and 0.80 for function (Dent et al, 2005). In this study, based on the 10% of transcripts checked, our coders obtained a high intra-rater reliability of 0.95 for the content category and an inter-rater reliability of 0.92.…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, several factors must be taken into consideration to make a well grounded decision for either video data or audio data (see also Dent, Brown, Dowsett, Tattersall, & Butow, 2005;Nicolai, Demmel, & Farsch, 2010). The biggest downfall of using audio data compared to video data is the loss of information embedded in the data.…”
Section: Gathering Behavioral Data In Meetingsmentioning
confidence: 99%